Skip to main content


OpenAI Finalizes $40 Billion Funding at $300 Billion Valuation


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-31/openai-finalizes-40-billion-funding-at-300-billion-valuation

in reply to misk

Insane to me with how much competition there is that are just as good along with all the free stuff available. It's not like early YouTube growing an insane amount of content before it started monetizing heavily. OpenAI is one of like a dozen, probably more, generative AI companies that are all close to each other in quality
in reply to network_switch

While I agree with you, ChatGPT is the one that people really know about in the mainstream. It is Normie AI
in reply to overload

Also the most accessible - just literally go to a website - don't even have to login if you don't want.

DeepSeek you have to install a fucking chrome extension (good luck doing that at work), or you have to create an account.

OpenAI still following the bigtech trend of "get them hooked for free, then make money"

in reply to Midnitte

There are some that are even more accessible. For example, if you use bing, it is right there at the start
in reply to Midnitte

except that "get em hooked for free" part isnt working, nor is the "then make money" part.
in reply to Midnitte

Here's a recent reuters report. reuters.com/technology/artific…

160 million active users is quite literally worse than many mobile games developed for a tens of, maybe hundreds of thousands of, usd. 160 million active users for 40 billion funding (they have needed more than this, but i cant be assed to go tally their funding) means theyve spent $250 per user, and their costs only grow as people use it. That is not including the massive server time subsidies Azure has provided them. This is not a profitable company and never will be.

"Block Blast" on the google play store has 40 million daily active users, 160 million monthly, and the studio has around 30 people. Its revenue from ads alone is in the tens of millions per month if this case study is accurate. Oai claims their monthly revenue in the hundreds of millions… with operating costs at greater hundreds of millions. oai profit is negative, with no signs of improving without entirely changing their business plan.

in reply to network_switch

There's inherent self-selection going on by being on Lemmy in the first place. Plenty of people are happy to just take in what the algorithm feeds to them and are unaware of how URLs work; they just click links.
in reply to misk

What is this? "Give us another $40 billion and we can have a compelling product"? AI at this point is glorified Clippy. And Altman has already said he needs $7 trillion.

I've used ChatGPT in daily work, and while it does things I need it to do, it's a timesaver, not some sort of view-the-whole-world-in-a-new-way-after-losing-one's-virginity solution, which is what it's been sold as since (apologies) release.