Alright, y'all were right, fuck Proton. This was the last straw for me.
For context, in my password manager I had tried formatting some of my entrees so that it would contain the usual username and password, but instead of creating whole new entrees for the security questions for the same account, I just added additional fields in the same entree in order to keep things a little more tidy.
I was not expecting that doing so would result in later being shaken down by Proton to pay even more money just to access the same few bytes of fucking text I had trusted them with. This is sleazy as fuck and I am dropping these idiots entirely.
like this

afk_strats
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Jo Miran
in reply to afk_strats • • •afk_strats
in reply to Jo Miran • • •Jo Miran
in reply to afk_strats • • •Eh. I am very happy with thwir service, but I didn't opt for the free tier. It has replaced my old VPN service provider, 1Password, google's 2FA, Google Drive, and the office suite is useful.
Since i was paying for other services that offered no privacy, switching to a single paid service with privacy ended up saving me money, so no complaints.
like this
giantpaper likes this.
grillgamesh
in reply to Jo Miran • • •i migrated from Firefox password manager, google mail, Cisco duo (kill it with fire please for the love of Turing and Tesla), and several other services. the only thing they don't have that I really want at the moment is collaborative document editing but I'm pretty sure that's on the docket of "things to add".
like this
giantpaper likes this.
mrnobody
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Dude, jfc calm down. You pay a little money to get premium services, instead of them monetizing user data. This is the way the world works with paid software, except they're not making money on your data and you, just you.
Maybe some context in what exactly you pay for would help too. I'm assuming you pay for a base tier of mail, bc I use their password manager too but pay for the full suite, and don't have this issue.
Maybe also a chat with support might find this to be an unexpected bug, but instead you're coming to Lemmy to the echo chamber of hate on proton which won't help.
fauxerious
in reply to mrnobody • • •like this
ZoDoneRightNow and TVA like this.
ttyybb
in reply to mrnobody • • •like this
ZoDoneRightNow and TVA like this.
panda_abyss
in reply to mrnobody • • •It is a shakedown to accept your data for free then charge you to access it later.
What the fuck else would you call that?
like this
ZoDoneRightNow and TVA like this.
ExcessShiv
in reply to panda_abyss • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to ExcessShiv • • •Uh no. First off, I'm not on the free tier. I'm not on the most expensive tier, but I do pay for my account $4.99 monthly. Second, I used the built in features exactly as intended. Every login entree in Proton Pass has the option to add additional fields that you can name. That's what I did, every security question being the name, and every answer being the data filled in. There was nothing to circumvent, because at least according to their pricing plans, even the free tier claims to allow unlimited logins.
It is literally ransomware. They allowed me to enter data in their program as intended, and then held that data ransom in order to pressure me into upgrading into a higher tier.
iByteABit
in reply to mrnobody • • •You call it an echo chamber, others call it having some standards on how much your software should be taking advantage of you instead of the other way around.
like this
TVA likes this.
mrnobody
in reply to iByteABit • • •You have to admit, there are plenty of people either on Reddit (especially) or Lemmy, that seem to crack on/bash on certain companies or views on topics as a heard mentality. I'm guilty of it in the past bc I wanted to trust the heard, but after doing my own research have found whatever it was to not be so bad.
I've not been here long, but man, the amount of hate I've seen towards proton so far is crazy.
AnimalsDream
in reply to mrnobody • • •mrnobody
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •bleustenns
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Edit: I do pay 40 euro yearly for email through them. Do not care at all for their other offerings.
AnimalsDream
in reply to mrnobody • • •You sound like the kind of person who, in the 90s, would have defended Microsoft against GNU and Linux and the FOSS movement as a whole, "This is the way the world works." No. I was using Keepass prior to Proton Pass. Proton proved to be a downgrade in every way. As a company they are in the same bracket as Ubuntu - trojan horse style grifters who wave juuust enough open-source around to lull users into dependency on a service that overall does not support user freedoms. They are grifters. It's the same playbook as Google.
Software needs to be free on every level. It's fine to sell free software, but if any part of it is proprietary, it's as the FSF says - it's a tool of unjust power over you.
And I don't need that. Better alternatives already exist. Proton was straight up a downgrade.
mrnobody
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •So then, like many people, make the switch without being so vocally negative? Or post a comparison on how KeePass vs Proton- KP wins, etc.
Even more, Proton and other companies like them are a good popular gateway to introduce "the masses" to privacy and what it feels like to reclaim their personal lives. It also gives them a "big" name they can put some faith into that the apps will work/won't crash, and aren't invasive. So much other marketing and money is spent telling everyone the little guys are the hackers and data thieves, etc. So don't trust them. So, the mentality is hard to shake.
I sound like the kind of person who understands how business models work (to an extent). Not every single person is going to setup full homelab environments to run all these locally hosted services, or spend a while researching and testing various FOSS applications to try and get "the very best"one. You sound like the kind of person who has a very stern opinion and gets upset when others don't agree or your shouting doesn't get them to understand why an alternative is better.
... Show more...So then, like many people, make the switch without being so vocally negative? Or post a comparison on how KeePass vs Proton- KP wins, etc.
Even more, Proton and other companies like them are a good popular gateway to introduce "the masses" to privacy and what it feels like to reclaim their personal lives. It also gives them a "big" name they can put some faith into that the apps will work/won't crash, and aren't invasive. So much other marketing and money is spent telling everyone the little guys are the hackers and data thieves, etc. So don't trust them. So, the mentality is hard to shake.
I sound like the kind of person who understands how business models work (to an extent). Not every single person is going to setup full homelab environments to run all these locally hosted services, or spend a while researching and testing various FOSS applications to try and get "the very best"one. You sound like the kind of person who has a very stern opinion and gets upset when others don't agree or your shouting doesn't get them to understand why an alternative is better.
I work with a lot of users who don't understand the basics of privacy or how data is sucked up at every corner of the Internet. I slowly plant the seeds to show them big names aren't always better. Little by little they're finding these things (popular little guys) on their own, and in that discovery keeps their interests piqued vs being told what to do.
planish
in reply to mrnobody • • •It sounds like this is the free service charging to access data you already gave them with the expectation it would always be available later. And which might not exist elsewhere.
That's not fremium, that's ransomware.
AnimalsDream
in reply to planish • • •mrnobody
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Lol at you both! First, I think you need help with your dictionaries because you're using the complete wing terminology.... That or you're super dramatic calling it ransomware LMAO. You're probably also those types who jump to comment at anything CG just to post AI slop... Like how back in the day it was cool to post "first" on something.
There are free tiers and paid tiers, and sounds like OP was trying to work around those free tiers to get a few extra benefits. If not, and genuinely trying to use a certain way, why not contact support to try and get access to that data even temporarily, or go to community forum to see if it's by design? Why not look for a proper resolution vs just complaining about it?
BTW I can completely understand the frustrations, but you gotta also understand not every single company or dev is going to use the same exact method, designs, goals, etc. Proton, starting from scientists not business entrepreneurs. They decided to build a suite of apps as alternatives to the popular big brother versions, the paid tiers help support the free ones so e
... Show more...Lol at you both! First, I think you need help with your dictionaries because you're using the complete wing terminology.... That or you're super dramatic calling it ransomware LMAO. You're probably also those types who jump to comment at anything CG just to post AI slop... Like how back in the day it was cool to post "first" on something.
There are free tiers and paid tiers, and sounds like OP was trying to work around those free tiers to get a few extra benefits. If not, and genuinely trying to use a certain way, why not contact support to try and get access to that data even temporarily, or go to community forum to see if it's by design? Why not look for a proper resolution vs just complaining about it?
BTW I can completely understand the frustrations, but you gotta also understand not every single company or dev is going to use the same exact method, designs, goals, etc. Proton, starting from scientists not business entrepreneurs. They decided to build a suite of apps as alternatives to the popular big brother versions, the paid tiers help support the free ones so everyone could have access. The money also helps fund staff support, devs, qa, etc. Just saying. There's a lot more polish on those apps than pretty much any actually free and private so out there. And having the support there to answer questions vs rely solely on wordy documentation or community forums is now speaking to the average Joe.
AnimalsDream
in reply to mrnobody • • •VeganCheesecake
in reply to mrnobody • • •Vaultwarden is free. Bitwarden is free. Bitwarden Premium is 10€/year.
For what it offers, Proton is pretty expensive. They are also making inter-operation with other services difficult or impossible.
There's much worse, but they aren't that great either.
mrnobody
in reply to VeganCheesecake • • •Ok, thank you. A sensible response.
I think their appeal and approach is to target newbies to the whole privacy thing. They can replace much of the "Gooplesoft" ecosystems (just made that up that word lol) with their own version, offer support for those who're learning/trucks migrating, etc. Maybe they overheard someone talk about it, are curious, or don't know all the terminology in the FOSS community, or get overwhelmed easily.
I will forever plug Proton (unless they change) to friends and family as it's a "big name" doing big tech, better.. then they have proton support to rely on, not me lol.
VeganCheesecake
in reply to mrnobody • • •brooke592
in reply to mrnobody • • •blitzen
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •like this
TVA likes this.
halcyoncmdr
in reply to blitzen • • •Creat
in reply to blitzen • • •like this
TVA likes this.
tiny
in reply to Creat • • •Opisek
in reply to tiny • • •like this
TVA likes this.
Serinus
in reply to tiny • • •Creat
in reply to tiny • • •Self hosting BitWarden still means it's accessbile for them and/or from them. ~~You also have no way to audit their security from what I understand. VaultWarden is FOSS, if you want to, you can go check. And it does get checked by people with the competence to check this do every now and then.~~ [Edit: I forgot that BitWarden is actually souce-available as well, while not being FOSS that's still better than most solutions]. I just prefer full FOSS whenever possible. I prefer it not be a black bos I just happen to run on my own server.
If you self host VaultWarden, the instance can just be not accessible from the internet, and only from behing a VPN. Obviously this is inherently much safer. If that's possible with the self-host option I don't know, but even just for licensing the local instance will have to be able to reach their servers (possibly be reachable from their servers, too). I did see they got an "offline deployment" option for air-gapped servers, but haven't looked into what limitations that entails.
Additionally, you're still within their licensing model. S
... Show more...Self hosting BitWarden still means it's accessbile for them and/or from them. ~~You also have no way to audit their security from what I understand. VaultWarden is FOSS, if you want to, you can go check. And it does get checked by people with the competence to check this do every now and then.~~ [Edit: I forgot that BitWarden is actually souce-available as well, while not being FOSS that's still better than most solutions]. I just prefer full FOSS whenever possible. I prefer it not be a black bos I just happen to run on my own server.
If you self host VaultWarden, the instance can just be not accessible from the internet, and only from behing a VPN. Obviously this is inherently much safer. If that's possible with the self-host option I don't know, but even just for licensing the local instance will have to be able to reach their servers (possibly be reachable from their servers, too). I did see they got an "offline deployment" option for air-gapped servers, but haven't looked into what limitations that entails.
Additionally, you're still within their licensing model. So for certain features you need to have a not-free account (like even just more than 2 people).
And like others said, VaultWarden is much lighter on resources in general and you aren't limited in what you can and can't do (users, collecitons, auth-options, ...).
blitzen
in reply to Creat • • •I’m with you, but the hosted subscription is miles more secure than I can make my installation, and at $10 per year probably cheaper than the electricity to self host. Plus it supports the devs.
But I do make regular backups in case I need to migrate.
teuniac_
in reply to blitzen • • •I think their prices have increased, but it's still a good deal
bitwarden.com/pricing/
Squizzy
in reply to teuniac_ • • •eli
in reply to Squizzy • • •uninvitedguest
in reply to Squizzy • • •moopet
in reply to uninvitedguest • • •CoyoteFacts
in reply to teuniac_ • • •JPAKx4
in reply to CoyoteFacts • • •FauxLiving
in reply to CoyoteFacts • • •If you want a nice way to elevate the usability of your setup use Tailscale (or self-host Headscale) and run your devices on a VPN.
My devices are never not on my "LAN", they maintain a VPN connection and access my local services as if they're wired in. Remote pihole, multimedia streaming, password management etc are all covered by this one solution without needing to deal with reverse proxies and certificates.
GlenRambo
in reply to teuniac_ • • •Creat
in reply to blitzen • • •Your first point is debatable. You still have to trust them to be that secure, and you can't verify that. If they are ever breached, it's literally the worst case scenario. You can self-host their solution, but only in the enterprise tier (6$ per user per month). Also BitWarden is a target woth attacking, I am not. BitWarden hosts thousands of instances worthy of being attacked individually. A personal VaultWarden instance of "Mike and Molly Peterson" isn't exactly an attractive target. I do think they are pretty secure, but a single mistake with these stakes can have immense consequences. LastPass was also breached repeatedly, with a similar buiseness model.
The second point about electricity wouldn't be true in my particular case, as the server for self-hosting it is running anyway. Running VaultWarden or not doesn't change the power usage noticably. Obviously this is different for someone who doesn't just have a server at home running anyway.
Side note: I'm not actually running a personal VaultWarden instance, as my personal requirements are being met just fine with
... Show more...Your first point is debatable. You still have to trust them to be that secure, and you can't verify that. If they are ever breached, it's literally the worst case scenario. You can self-host their solution, but only in the enterprise tier (6$ per user per month). Also BitWarden is a target woth attacking, I am not. BitWarden hosts thousands of instances worthy of being attacked individually. A personal VaultWarden instance of "Mike and Molly Peterson" isn't exactly an attractive target. I do think they are pretty secure, but a single mistake with these stakes can have immense consequences. LastPass was also breached repeatedly, with a similar buiseness model.
The second point about electricity wouldn't be true in my particular case, as the server for self-hosting it is running anyway. Running VaultWarden or not doesn't change the power usage noticably. Obviously this is different for someone who doesn't just have a server at home running anyway.
Side note: I'm not actually running a personal VaultWarden instance, as my personal requirements are being met just fine with KeePass files. We do run an instance at work, but it isn't world-accessible (internal access only).
rageagainstmachines
in reply to blitzen • • •blitzen
in reply to rageagainstmachines • • •ExcessShiv
in reply to blitzen • • •impersonator
in reply to ExcessShiv • • •like this
TVA likes this.
ExcessShiv
in reply to impersonator • • •Where? I can't seem to find that option anywhere in my bitwarden app
Edit: NVM found it, it's just hidden by several clicks before it's an option.
favoredponcho
in reply to ExcessShiv • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to blitzen • • •Hexadecimalkink
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •artyom
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •What are you paying for currently?
AnimalsDream
in reply to artyom • • •I had to look into it, because their pricing plans seem to have changed now. Evidently I have something called Proton Plus, $4.99 per month. It looks like that plans benefits do not extend to additional Proton Pass features.
I'm going to be transferring accounts away from Proton and then closing my accounts entirely. Already moved all my passwords back to Keepass. My main email address has been on posteo(.de), which has been great. Super reliable service from a company who appears to actually get the ethos of FOSS. I only pay, I think $12 per year for their service.
artyom
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to artyom • • •I'm sorry, but what? Number one, we're talking about text. Bytes of data, which costs next to nothing to store. If you think that it is in any way fair for a company to allow a person to enter information into an account, and then unexpectedly charge them to access that same data, you are insane. If you paid for a storage rental, moved your belongings into it, and then found that the company changed the lock and decided you had to pay more to get your stuff - would you continue renting that storage?
Go back to reddit, corposhill.
artyom
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •No but your files are not stored as text files. That's not what you're paying for. You're paying for the development of the software used to create, store and fill them at the appropriate times and places. If you don't care about that, just keep them stored as text files on your computer. Boom, problem solved.
You keep using that phrase. You are not "paying more" because you never paid anything in the first place.
If you think Reddit is the only place that's going to call you out for being a choosy beggar, you're in for a surprise.
AnimalsDream
in reply to artyom • • •But you say just below this that I never paid for anything in the first place? In any case, whether paid or not, they still have to compete with other options including free ones like Keepass. Why would I pay for Proton over the free Keepass if Proton is basically ransomware?
Untrue. I was paying for it, and they required that I pay even more just to access the data that their system allowed me to enter.
You rn:
artyom
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Excuse me, let me correct myself: That's what you're not paying for. Better? Does that make you anymore correct?
KeePass is local storage. It's not managed. But by all means, If you don't see the value, use KeePass. Not sure what you're complaining here for.
Okay, so you stopped paying for it. That's why you can no longer access it. You can still export your data and import it into KeePass. So go do it.
gerowen
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •like this
giantpaper likes this.
AlmightyDoorman
in reply to gerowen • • •vatlark
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to vatlark • • •vatlark
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •atropa
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •like this
TVA likes this.
0xtero
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Obviously you're free to do as you please and its not an airport, you don't have to announce your departure.
But there's no such thing as free service. Posting angry tirades seems counter productive.
I'd recommend self-hosting. Then you don't have to worry about privacy, getting data hijacked or getting ripped off by sudden cost increases.
like this
Thorael likes this.
ViatorOmnium
in reply to 0xtero • • •like this
TVA likes this.
nover6
in reply to ViatorOmnium • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to 0xtero • • •photonic_sorcerer
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •KeepassXC + Syncthing has worked fine for me for a few years. Sure, it's a bit of a hassle and not exactly perfect, but nothing is. I have control over my data and I don't have to pay anyone anything, that's enough for me.
Also, tasty entrees 🤤
like this
Thorael likes this.
Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ
in reply to photonic_sorcerer • • •photonic_sorcerer
in reply to Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ • • •eli
in reply to photonic_sorcerer • • •Hassle? What hassle? Adding a new device to the syncthing swarm and adding the folder where your database is stored?
I also have been using KeepassXC and syncthing for years. Best thing I have ever done!
photonic_sorcerer
in reply to eli • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to photonic_sorcerer • • •This is the route I'm taking. Keepass has always been tried and true. I switched from Keepass to Proton Pass for a while, and in more ways than this one complaint it has been very much a downgrade.
Proton does not know how to make quality software.
swelter_spark
in reply to photonic_sorcerer • • •photonic_sorcerer
in reply to swelter_spark • • •Catfish [she/her]
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Otiz
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to Otiz • • •Otiz
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Oh yeah, this is a very annoying pricing model. Proportionally very expensive for each individual part/product, but then a proportionally lower price for the whole thing. But in absolute amounts, more money was payed.
The closest example I can think of is fast food cup sizes.
What they want is for you to think "Hmm I need a VPN and an email, but it's cheaper to just buy the whole unlimited package"
mlg
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •I tried protonmail not for the privacy purpose but just to have a normal web email client.
After wasting an hour before finding out you can't disable the "sent from protonmail" footer without manually deleting it in each draft you make, I said screw it and deployed my own email server with stalwart lol.
It's receive only because outgoing SMTP is a pain to make reliable these days and my ISP blocks outgoing SMTP anyway, but for everything else I now use Thunderbird.
like this
TVA likes this.
Dave
in reply to mlg • • •It might have changed but there is a setting for it now.
Pretty annoying that I'm just learning setting no signature did nothing since they added a second signature option for when sending from mobile and enabled it by default.
Squizzy
in reply to Dave • • •I have always hated this, the signature settings need to be unified. Why would I ever want a different signature to alert people that I am on my phome. Gmail allows ios to match their web signature but not android.
Sent from my fucking phone.
Jack_Burton
in reply to mlg • • •dan1101
in reply to Jack_Burton • • •eli
in reply to dan1101 • • •Yeah I'm on free tier(evaluating proton as a whole) and I don't see this option in my mobile app. I'll have to look at the web to see if it's there...but I doubt it
*Edit, checked the web client. Found the option, but it's a mail plus feature, so I can't disable it as a free user.
Jack_Burton
in reply to eli • • •Jack_Burton
in reply to dan1101 • • •dan1101
in reply to Jack_Burton • • •harmbugler
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •hector
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •I know someone that signed up for an account with them, they froze it immediately for suspicious activity. He does nothing with that IP address, reads, social media, that's it. No way to get off the shit list without giving up personal information like a phone number and or alternate email and no guarentee that would fix it.
Their IP was on a blacklist from some shady company for some strange reason. But other companies let you write the company and plead your case, proton does not.
They further suspended a bunch of accounts based on some half baked unproven accusations by the government(s) if I recall.
They aren't trustworthy, they will give you up at the first sign of friction it appears.
unsettlinglymoist
in reply to hector • • •That happened to me. I wasn't even on a VPN when I created my first and only Proton account, and within minutes they restricted it so I couldn't send any mail. They said I would have to upgrade to a paid account if I wanted to send mail.
I would never trust Proton after that. I'm just glad they immediately restricted my account instead of waiting until I'd switched everything over.
hector
in reply to unsettlinglymoist • • •Check your ip against the lists of blacklists, there are sites that do it directly from the search page, there are a few dozen blacklists supposedly for spam and the like.
I suspect israel critics get dropped on them. A brazillian firm did the one we found.
unsettlinglymoist
in reply to hector • • •whyNotSquirrel
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •For the password and passkeys manager I went with a selfhosted solution: AliasVault on an VPS and it's really great! If you have a domain name you can have unlimited aliases with it's built in email server (with a subdomain and for receiving email only so you don't have to worry about being blacklisted)
The installation script is making everything for you, even fetching the TLS certificate from "let's encrypt"
There's Android and iOs support as well as add-ons for most browsers
AliasVault - Privacy-First Password & Email Alias Manager
AliasVaultAnimalsDream
in reply to whyNotSquirrel • • •☂️-
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to ☂️- • • •Xorg_Broke_Again
in reply to ☂️- • • •tomenzgg
in reply to Xorg_Broke_Again • • •It's more that he's comfortable associating with fascists than one outright (I don't know that we know enough about his own political stances).
Shortly after Trump was elected a second time, he tweeted, "10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned," (archive.ph/iKaz3). Which, like…the first time Trump won, I might see; the second time – though –, Trump's made clear his desire to threaten and harm everyone within reach. The further along we go in his second term, the more he's followed through on what he'd been promising the entire campaign.
While I, likewise, disagree with the tech. inclinations of certain camps of the Democrats, that by and far wouldn't convince me to throw my support behind the fascist leader who's spent 8 years, now, harming and indicating he'll harm huge swaths of communities and populations.
As far as I know, that's usually what people are ref
... Show more...It's more that he's comfortable associating with fascists than one outright (I don't know that we know enough about his own political stances).
Shortly after Trump was elected a second time, he tweeted, "10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned," (archive.ph/iKaz3). Which, like…the first time Trump won, I might see; the second time – though –, Trump's made clear his desire to threaten and harm everyone within reach. The further along we go in his second term, the more he's followed through on what he'd been promising the entire campaign.
While I, likewise, disagree with the tech. inclinations of certain camps of the Democrats, that by and far wouldn't convince me to throw my support behind the fascist leader who's spent 8 years, now, harming and indicating he'll harm huge swaths of communities and populations.
As far as I know, that's usually what people are referring to and the precariousness of trusting an individual who'd make decisions like this.
☂️-
in reply to Xorg_Broke_Again • • •bridgeenjoyer
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Answer for all
"yourmom"
termaxima
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •nek0d3r
in reply to termaxima • • •termaxima
in reply to nek0d3r • • •nek0d3r
in reply to termaxima • • •Hawk
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Not sure what this has to do with privacy.
Extra features require a subscription, big fucking surprise.
You can self-host, but that could be an actual privacy nightmare.
Zerush
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to Zerush • • •Zerush
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •mulcahey
in reply to Zerush • • •brooke592
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •That's scummy as fuck.
I guarantee they do that on purpose just like all other scams that make you invest your time before telling you you need to pay.
skozzii
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to skozzii • • •FoundFootFootage78
in reply to skozzii • • •Ohmmy
in reply to FoundFootFootage78 • • •stardust
in reply to FoundFootFootage78 • • •FoundFootFootage78
in reply to stardust • • •stardust
in reply to FoundFootFootage78 • • •Complimentary remarks to Republicans depicting them as a party open to being privacy respecting and respect for the rule of law. Took the Joe Rogan hand book of trying to sane wash the Republicans and downplay concerns regarding them while trying to come off as moderate.
And it aged terribly. Someone who went to Harvard and spent significant time in the US wasn't blind to what those way less educated than him saw when it came to the direction the US was headed towards before Trump officially took office.
He was rightfully criticized because Trump never hid his intentions during the election, so people were not impressed by the pandering like all the current tech bros part of the Trump inner circle.
ScoffingLizard
in reply to FoundFootFootage78 • • •Sunsofold
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to Sunsofold • • •According to other comments in this thread, Bitwarden does similar crap. I went back to Keepass.
As for the data, luckily it was for an account I don't need or use anymore, so I just deleted everything and moved on.
cy_narrator
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •babyfarmer
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •tessa (she/they)
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •jsnfwlr
in reply to tessa (she/they) • • •tessa (she/they)
in reply to jsnfwlr • • •James R Kirk
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •HugeNerd
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •AnimalsDream
in reply to HugeNerd • • •HugeNerd
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Fokeu
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •Ravenlord
in reply to AnimalsDream • • •This is a great service!
2FAS — Authenticator and Password Manager
2fas.com