@xtaran

Recently for a review paper, one #referee suggested about 25 citations, with 22 having one (very prominent) author in common and the 2 others by former group members of this prominent author.

Even more friendly, in the review they were all mentioned by #PubMed Id only.

For the 25th one, there was probably a typo in the ID, as it was a 1970s paper even more utterly unrelated.

One of the 22 was a popular science review paper on film-making in the field of #biophysics.

1/2