Skip to main content


This is something I've suspected from the early days of the AI boom. If this stuff was as good as they claim, it would be a closely guarded industrial secret. The fact they're so eager to get us to use it tells me it's primary value isn't what it can do, but what it can be sold for. Or, as Cory says, "Go Meta!".

If you think about it, this is coming from a group of people who famously fetishize disruption. The fact that they aren't using their own #AI to disrupt & take over the sectors they are so keen to sell their product to is a huge red flag.

@pluralistic Why aren't #AI companies competing directly with their customers? (13 Jul 2026)
pluralistic.net/2026/07/13/go-…

in reply to Tyler Smith πŸ«πŸ«’

@pluralistic. How to make money during a gold rush: 1) buy a lot of shovels 2) start a gold rush 3) on no account ever waste your time digging
in reply to Tim Gent

please see Softbank investment strategy, bought into Nvidia, pumped AI, got out 6 months ago promising to directly invest in OpenAI.. [edit: thanks to Steffen below, removed: have not done so].
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Tyler Smith πŸ«πŸ«’

I remember my PhD supervisor talking about battery research, if you see a nice-looking academic paper in a high-impact journal from scientists at a company like Samsung or Panasonic (etc.)... It means that paper's approach is not practical in industry. Cause otherwise it would have never been published.
⇧