@sortius My point was more that it’s impossible (by definition) to make a clean-room implementation if you use the source code. Clean-room implementations, by definition, are based on reverse engineering and the ability to prove you did *not* have access to the source code (to copy/derive from).
hehehe, I'm not a dev, but even to me it was bullshit corporate speak. It's a trick to get devs to buy into LLMs, which is all just a roundabout way of saying "feed my LLM your code so you're redundant".
Don't worry, us geeks who aren't devs see what's going on. It's why I'm glad I'm not on ICT any more; everything I used to do is all LLMs or Kubernetes or whatever bullshit
sortius
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Workers who fall for ‘corporate bullshit’ may be worse at their jobs, study finds
Michael Sainato (The Guardian)Aral Balkan
in reply to sortius • • •@sortius My point was more that it’s impossible (by definition) to make a clean-room implementation if you use the source code. Clean-room implementations, by definition, are based on reverse engineering and the ability to prove you did *not* have access to the source code (to copy/derive from).
But yes, your point also stands :)
sortius
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •hehehe, I'm not a dev, but even to me it was bullshit corporate speak. It's a trick to get devs to buy into LLMs, which is all just a roundabout way of saying "feed my LLM your code so you're redundant".
Don't worry, us geeks who aren't devs see what's going on. It's why I'm glad I'm not on ICT any more; everything I used to do is all LLMs or Kubernetes or whatever bullshit