Skip to main content


“That is, the most likely reason why Trump’s entire national security team was using an insecure platform to plan war strikes was to ensure there were no embarrassing records for posterity, a violation of the law.”

👆 Folks, I’m seeing more of this lately so please, stop. Understand what you’re taking about before spouting off. Signal *is* a secure platform and peddling nonsense like this is only going to make people less secure if they believe it and stop using it. What it can’t do is protect you if you’re clueless enough to add someone to your *secure* conversation who shouldn’t be there.

emptywheel.net/2025/03/25/seve…

#signal #USA #fascism #misinformation

in reply to Aral Balkan

But people who don't know what they're talking about authoritatively peddling nonsense is the cornerstone of journalism! The Gell-Mann amnesia effect depends on it!
in reply to Aral Balkan

The problem Aral is that US news is *searching hard* to demonstrate phishing attacks, keylogging, and backdoors / OS malware as somehow issues with #signal. Just saw an NBC piece that was atrocious where they blamed bogus QR codes as somehow a Signal problem. They'll find #infosec people to either scramble the facts or talk about phishing and be taken out of context.
in reply to Aral Balkan

that looks like something Marcy wheeler posted and she generally knows her subject matter. She wasn’t dissing signal, she was explaining that not using sanctioned us government communications circumvented record keeping and makes fulfilling freedom of information requests avoidable.