Skip to main content


Dear Fedi friends,

I'd like to put together a list of people who are publicly resisting / calling out LLMs and AI slop.

Why? I enjoy reading my Fediverse feed in topical lists and I need something to counteract the unrelenting AI hype I see in the media.

Do you have any recommendations?

So far, at the top of my list I have:

@timnitGebru @emilymbender and @alexhanna of @DAIR

plus @cwebber @jaredwhite and @tante

Anyone else to recommend who advocates for #NoAI?

FediThing reshared this.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I wish we'd have CW for both sides, because I really don't want to hear more from either. Enough has been said to make up minds, and now it just seems like an infinite echo that is slowly driving me mad.
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

No worries. It only helps if it becomes a norm anyway, and I think others will appreciate what you are doing. ❤
in reply to Trezzer (aka Helvedeshunden)

@trezzer I feel really bad because I use CW super frequently.

Sorry it didn't occur to me for this post but I will use CW from now on...

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

@trezzer

The #NoAI tag is common enough that it's a good candidate for setting up a filter to turn any post with that tag into a CW post.

I'm a fan of standard tags instead of CWs for things that are not violent or sexual but a decent sized group would want to hide since they give people the power to control their own timelines more effectively.

in reply to George B

@gbargoud

Same!
I also use content warnings when I answer to a 'puzzle' to not give away the answer 😀

And then: as a teacher of Adobe software, I usually start the first classes with 'We won't be using AI, what's more: I will show you how to hide all their AI options. You can make them visible again once you have enough skills and knowledge to evaluate their results. You need to learn how to do it first, before you let AI do this automatically."

Teaching people skills: 💗

@_elena @trezzer

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Pas immédiatement l’IA, mais sur la matérialité du numérique et des centres de données il y a @lenuageetaitsousnospieds et @tunubesecamirio . @Aepasek a publié une très bonne brochure sur comment résister aux datacenters, et sur la géopolitique du numérique je ne peux que conseiller le livre de @opheliecoelho ! @dataforgood fait du bon boulot également 👍
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

@pluralistic is absolutely essential. @eff (while not inherently against LLMs) and @openrightsgroup also do great work.
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I collect evidence that LLMs need to be run in a Fediverse Like Structure, how its destructive in the hands of few, since months, everyday :) Thanks for the list btw :)
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

regarding LLMs, it's crazy from developers' perspective. BIG tech is pushing LLMs hard to developers, saying you'll lose job or will be paid less if not using LLMs. That's what they are pushing, my colleague did even said "If you're not going to use it, you'll lose job or will be paid less." My boss doesn't like to use LLM for development, so far so good, but there is huge push and pressure towards it.
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Jan Dytrych🇨🇿🇺🇦

@jan ouf that's rough. I personally know a lot of people in this space - here in France - and it's really rough out there. Not to mention the collapsing valuation of most software start-ups since early 2025 (US politics + Claude + geopolitical tensions = lethal mix)
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Film idea: "Back to the roots". They meet in secret. In coding dojos. They write code by hand. They have ancient books, real books, printed, with names like "Assembly Guide for the x86 ISA", "High Performance Python" that are sacred bibles of ancient knowledge. Follow our hero as she goes from LLM withdrawal to changing the world with hand-written code that frees the minds of millions. @jan
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

@jwildeboer @jan
I had the very same idea for such a story as well, although apparently vi is out of scope now
ioc.exchange/@CKL/116161896679…
in reply to Jan Dytrych🇨🇿🇺🇦

@jan Waiting for the rise of artisanal coding, when people who code without LLMs are paid extra money to provide customized, reliable code.
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Here's an article you'll probably, enjoy, though, even if it's in Danish (but I know you know your way around that ;) ) videnskab.dk/kultur-samfund/ai…
in reply to Trezzer (aka Helvedeshunden)

@trezzer thank you, I really appreciate!

I need to go pick up my little one from daycare but I will read it ASAP (just saved it to my Linkwarden) 🤗

in reply to Rodrigo Santamaría

@efialto @tunubesecamirio muchas gracias Rodrigo :)

@_elena I will also suggest the account of @niasoler (our representative in Spain) also @milamiceli and her work about Data Workers in AI data-workers.org/

also @AlgoRace is here too

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

@kawunngg :blobcatheart: Thank you!

The sentence that inspired most of my humble resistance, was the one I read by the author of Nepenthes:

“I’m just fed up, and you know what? Let’s fight back, even if it’s not successful. Be indigestible. Grow spikes.”

(src: arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20… )

Elena Rossini ⁂ reshared this.

in reply to David Revoy

@davidrevoy awww I LOVE this quote. Thanks for sharing David!!! And taking this opportunity to thank you for your extraordinary work

@kawunngg

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

@WeirdWriter wrote two great Anti LLM posts, from the point of view as a writer and what it's doing to his community, if you want something that's outside commentary on this. Have tissues, you will cry from the beauty and care after getting angry.

sightlessscribbles.com/the-col…
sightlessscribbles.com/posts/t…

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Esther Payne

happy swear

Sensitive content

in reply to Loohoosaher

happy swear

Sensitive content

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

RE happy swear

Sensitive content

in reply to Robert Kingett

RE happy swear

Sensitive content

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I came across a cool humoristic method of resistance, see the For Ai Only section :
davidrevoy.com/article1124/new…

(Si tu ne connais pas David Revoy, son travail est intéressant.)

This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Anil Dash

@anildash you 1000% belong to my list Anil ! And thanks @Standard_Phil for the suggestion

FYI Anil if you don't know @jaredwhite he has a superb podcast titled Vibe Coded ("about the perils & pitfalls of creative intellectual automation; and why the future of good Internet vibes is for the humans, by the humans") : jaredwhite.com/projects/

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

We also have projects that are explicitly not accepting AI like @gentoo .

We also have folk like @xgranade who is working on a fork of calibre. Which I am very grateful for.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I'm noisy enough about it to release a slopfree index and blog about it a bit, although I try (only semi-successfully) to balance out my feed with stuff that isn't AI
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

That's difficult.
Aislop and hype are one side, there are good uses for it as well. So, just blaming LLMs feels like blaming a knife for murder.
in reply to DataKnightmare

@DataKnightmare thanks! putting you both on my list 🙏

P.S.: your SUPERB podcast is really my favorite these days... I wish everyone spoke Italian so they could enjoy it 🥲

@davidgerard

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

There are many non celebrities (i.e ordinary folk without podcasts or books to promote) contributing to this discussion, probably disproportionately on Mastodon.

I started a #trojan_ai tag to locate examples of duplicitous AI promotion you can review as part of your enquiries.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

too kind! I did start an English version years ago, when the Big Thing was still techbros being techbros, but I had to suspend after just a few episodes, the production effort is not manageable. I keep wanting to return to it, though, in one form or another (mabe just publish the English script), especially when I touch a topic that is passing unnoticed.

Wait, I'm forgetting! I could *use AI* and have automated translations in 5 billion languages!
Or, like, not.

@davidgerard

in reply to DataKnightmare

@DataKnightmare every time I listen to your SUPERB podcast I can't help but think about how the Fediverse would love your takes... and I wish there could be an English version.

But as a fellow creative I completely understand the time factor involved 🥲

@davidgerard

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I'm a cloud app developer and I post from a fairly rabid anti-AI viewpoint sometimes - though whether that makes me recommendable I have no idea.
in reply to Esi

@esi henlo 👋

I also write critically about tech, including "AI", for Polish media, specifically OKO.press:
oko.press/autor/michal-rysiek-…

Some relevant examples:
oko.press/sztuczna-inteligencj…
oko.press/chinski-deepseek-upu…
oko.press/ai-nie-rozwiaze-kryz…

@Esi
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

(I've allowed myself to cut the CC)
I'd add Ed Zitron (no known mastodon, IDK if his BS is bridged), yet his style is very… “raw”, yet to the point.

@aftermath.site and @404mediaco, but you probably already know (about) the individual creators.

IDK about Cory Doctorow with his late LLM usage confession with a preemptive rhetorical strike.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I would clarify also that I am not quite #NoAI in terms of AI tech, but I am definitely opposed to the *AI industry* and this hype wave. There may be various useful things from this tech, but the net version of things with it being forced upon society right now in this hype wave is that everything is getting much worse, and sickeningly so.

Several more pieces need to be added to the puzzle to make "AI" tech more useful, and I'm also simply opposed to a direction in society that dismisses and devalues creative endeavors, which a lot of this hype is putting at the center of itself. Creativity is what makes life largely worthwhile. I'm not willing to give that up.

I have no problem with OpenImageDenoiser in Blender, which speeds up renders through machine learning, and in no way devalues creativity. But something which made it so I just typed a few words into Blender and it did all my artwork for me, I would oppose.

#NoAI
in reply to Christine Lemmer-Webber

thank you for that nuanced explanation Christine! I am 1000% aligned with you.

Of course I'm all for technology helping with medical breakthroughs, but I oppose the pillaging of creative output without consent, the erosion of critical thinking and the mass surveillance facilitated by these initiatives (amongst other things)...

in reply to Christine Lemmer-Webber

I have been appreciating your well considered takes!

I hate the AI hype. The bubble is bad. The effects on creative work and the environment is depressing.

But I am not looking for strict #NoAI content, but well reasoned and researched critical content. As an Electrical Engineer my interest is in understanding the state of the art. I can't learn this from those who refuse to look behind the veil.

#NoAI
in reply to poleguy looking for lost tools

@poleguy thank you for these thoughts. I saw this floating around in the discussion: do you think the hashtag AIcritic would be more appropriate?
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Maybe. I'm afraid we are in a very divisive world...

Republicans vs Democrats, Linux vs Windows, Android vs iOS, Packers vs Bears, Catholic vs Protestant, US vs China, Choice vs Abortion, Immigrant vs ICE, you name it... we pick a side, we find a cult leader to follow and we blindly glom on. Our side becomes the good side, the other side becomes the evil side.

Then we comfortably memorize 15 second talking points from endless tik-tok reels.

And we retreat into our bubbles. Sad. :-(

in reply to Christine Lemmer-Webber

@_elena @timnitGebru @emilymbender @alexhanna @DAIR @jaredwhite @tante

This is why it's so important to specify things like generative-AI. AI on its own is a meaningless nothing-word with how much it's shoved in everywhere and anywhere. Yeah, faster denoising with machine learning is great! But a slop machine that pollutes the environment and steals people's jobs and work for the purpose of deceiving others for capitalistic gain? Not so great.

I love the AI that detects cancers better than doctors can, I love the AIs that automatically remove pauses from audio recordings, and I love the AI that automates boring, tedious sh!t that humans hate doing such as spreadsheet organizing. I just fucking hate generative-AI specifically.

in reply to Luigi.exe (Dragonheart System)

@Eeveecraft
That 'help detect cancer better' doesn’t actually work all that well though, as it worsens doctors’ ability to detect/confirm cancer, gets worse over time as it can’t adapt to subtle outside changes, and has huge issues with biases. So while it might be slightly better for the standard-case of an average white man, it’s worse for everyone else.

Also at least your 'remove pause from audio' example sounds way more suited for relatively simple algorithms than statistical models to me.

(I do agree though that there are some cases where things that would be called 'AI' nowadays can actually be good)

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to trissc̈hen

@trisschen thank you for this! Immediately sharing it with all the men in my family who are all in the AI cult and routinely dismiss my critiques
in reply to Nenon

@nenon thanks for the tag!
@_elena I am fully on board with supporting those resisting AI (you've got a great list going!). I'm not a reporter or academic but I am a solarpunk writer, and AI has no place in a solarpunk future. 🔨

brightgreenfutures.substack.co…

(I wish @bcmerchant.bsky.social were on Masto, but I highly recommend subscribing to his newsletter and of course his book BLOOD IN THE MACHINE)

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

not sure if this counts, but I am adamantly #NoAI! all of my videos on @groupnebula563@cuddly.tube are proudly AI-free and my hit-counter.net project won’t provide counters to sites containing AI content! :)
in reply to Koantig

@koantig thank you for the excellent recommendations! (and for being part of the resistance) 🙏
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Add Aurora @tunubesecamirio - she is an amazing activist and public speaker with profound crutucism on AI for ecosocial reasons.

The name of their activist project, Tu Nube Seca Mi Rio, is so wellchosen, so visual for the damage these hyperscalers are making. Worth checking a translator for, careful with the LLMs though ;-)

in reply to Wouter Tebbens ⁂

@Wtebbens thank you Wouter for the great recommendation! I actually understand Spanish quite well (I'd say 70%) because it's so close to Italian... the phrase "tu nube seca mi río" is so poetic. Following now!
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I think everyone I follow is #NoAI lol, I went from teaching data sci and physics to teaching how to circumvent/remove #LLMs in data sci and physics... it's tough for the kids trying to learn through this slop 🙃 One thing I think helps a bit is to specify when dragging #LLM_AI vs #DecisionTree_AI #NeuralNet_AI or #Statistical_AI etc. Alot of phys/ data sci here uses #AI as a catchall for all of #datascience including #MachineLearning so it can get confusing (is likely meant to be lol).
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I do, in a very my corner of the world, which is academic libraries, kind of way. Snark, mostly, but also the occasional academic journal article or presentation.
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

🙋‍♀️ If that helps, I was quoted in this article calling AI the archenemesis of data privacy: arstechnica.com/security/2026/…

'Data privacy expert Em (she keeps her last name off the Internet) called AI assistants the “archnemesis” of data privacy because their utility relies on assembling massive amounts of data from myriad sources, including individuals.

“AI models are inherent data collectors,” she told Ars. “They rely on large data collection for training, improvements, operations, and customizations. More often than not, this data is collected without clear and informed consent (from unknowing training subjects or from platform users), and is sent to and accessed by a private company with many incentives to share and monetize this data.”'

in reply to Em

@Em0nM4stodon such an eloquent critique Em!

And yes I've added you to my list of AI Resistance 🤗

@DAIR

@Em @DAIR
in reply to tlariv

@tlariv thank you for the excellent recommendations! following them now and I really want to read their book
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I complain a lot about being forced to use LLMs at work
@jacel even more so
Not sure if that's what you're looking for, but we're here too
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I have been posting about this topic -- see quippd.com/writing/2025/12/17/… for a sample.

Also boost stuff I see. 🙂

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

It’s funny, I only really see people who are intensely hardline anti-AI on Mastodon, and only enthusiastic shortsighted AI bros on LinkedIn. Where’s the sensible center? (or people that don’t talk about AI at all, even better!)
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I don't want you to follow me, but I call out and resist "LLM AI" and related intellectual informational slop.
- It solves no problem I have
- It is a glorified search engine, not intelligence
- Pattern matching is not intelligence, ML can be good, but trust it with your life at your peril.
- All software is "Artificial Intelligence"
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

May I nominate myself? I have been using the hashtag #AITeaParty for my efforts to not use it directly or indirectly. I've also blogged yesterday about my depressing experience in going to my first in person developer meeting in years.

evilgeniuschronicles.org/posts…

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I suppose quitting my job over it yesterday and being quite vocal about it, especially over the last two days could qualify me 😅 I have a history of being actively anti-AI to the point of writing my transcripts and timecode them manually 🫠
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to X_Cli ⏚

@x_cli absolutely! added you to my list and I hope that you will find a great new job soon 🙏
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

putting humility aside, I can recommend myself as researcher and hacktivist, as a founding member of the collective Socialini.it (digital literacy workshops) and as the author of "Scritture digitali. Dai social media all'IA e all'editing genetico" (Meltemi, 2025), and as the translator of the Italian edition of "The AI Con" by @emilymbender and @alex which is going to be published on March 17 as "L'inganno dell'intelligenza artificiale. Come difenderci da Big Tech e costruire il futuro che vogliamo" (Fazi Editore). 🙂
in reply to kappazeta

@kappazeta assolutamente!!! ti ho appena messo sulla mia lista "AI resistance"

e congratulazioni per la traduzione del libro e per tutto il tuo lavoro wow!!!

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

A few more that leap to mind: @ali, who runs the AI Skeptics Reading Group, and @danmcquillan, author of Resisting AI.
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

me to Elena. I feel like I'm actively swatting the "use ai now" flies. Would love to be kept in the loop of #NoAi
#NoAI
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Just about everyone with a brain, WE all hope. Most can tell those pushing the slop are extremely irresponsible.

It's how dystopian movies begin repeating dystopian history

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Besides the accounts already mentioned, this on might be interesting:

@asrg "The Algorithmic Sabotage Research Group (ASRG) is a conspiratorial, practice-led research framework focused on the intersection of culture, politics, and technology."

@ASRG
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Shameless self-plug: You can add @PaulaToThePeople to the list. She hates AI with a passion, posts a lot under the hashtag #LLMMeAlone and moderates the only Fediverse instance I know of, where posting AI stuff is forbidden.
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

@PaulaToThePeople
If you’re making a big list, feel free to add me too. You saw my video, and the following short post is by far the most popular one on my little blog, with several thousand views 😱

noblogo.org/sknob/a-message-to…

in reply to sknob

@sknob beautifully written. And yes I’ve added you to my list 🙏
in reply to 707Kat

And @Gargron has been very outspoken about LLMs too. mastodon.social/@Gargron/11620…


Technology is not inevitable. We've decided not to have asbestos in our walls, lead in our pipes, or carginogenic chemicals in our food. (If you're going to argue that it's not everywhere, where would you rather live?) We could just not do LLMs. It's allowed.

in reply to 707Kat

@707Kat YES! I'm super grateful for @Gargron's outspokenness on these issues. Adding him to my "AI Resistance" list 😊
in reply to Leonieke

@leonieke YES of course! Not sure what's the best way to do it because lists are private (and it's getting very long)... maybe once Mastodon launches Starter Packs it would be easier?
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Yeah the privacy is a thing: good point. I will work my way through the visible replies :neocat_thumbup:

And I'm unsure how the Starter Packs will work with gotosocial instances ;-)

in reply to Leonieke

@leonieke ah yes, that's right, GTS.

I must have followed 30 new accounts - in addition to people I was already following who are vocal against AI - so I expect my list to be around 50 people? I'll find a way to share it with you... can you ping me tomorrow morning to remind me?

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Please, no rush, and I certainly do not mind checking the replies :neocat_thumbup:
in reply to Leonieke

@leonieke no need to apologize Leonieke !

I've made myself a cup of coffee and I'm reading posts from my "AI Resistance" feed for the first time this morning. Total number of accounts: 37.

A quick thought: the list needs some pruning.

If that's ok with you, I will use it for a day or two, make adjustments and then find a way to share it with you.

in reply to Leonieke

@leonieke
FYI: lists can be exported & imported with Mastodon. I've done this to create my own 'starterpacks' to help people start on the Fediverse with a feed of, in my case, PublicSpaces organizations. I did not include people because I did not have their explicit consent. A problem which the new Collections(?) from Mastodon tries to address.
in reply to @BjornW@mastodon.social

@BjornW @leonieke thank you for the helpful info! consent is a big thing for me, so I would only share my list privately...
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

happy to help! Sharing lists privately is the best solution until the Collections are rolled out with Mastodon v4.6.

PS:
For those reading along & interested in this:

- blog.joinmastodon.org/2025/10/…

- joinmastodon.org/roadmap

@leonieke

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

These people try something like starterpacks for Mastodon: fedidevs.com/starter-packs/

@leonieke

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I'm just a random person on the fediverse, but I, too, am against stochastic parrots automating Dunning-Kruger syndrome at the cost of culture and ecology!

Also you should add @davidrevoy

I don't know him either, but his #pepperandcarrot webcomic is making hilariously short work of the token pachinko fraud festival currently gripping markets.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Hi! I’d like to nominate myself for your list. I’m not nearly as high-profile as many of the folks that you mentioned or who are being recommended, but I am a practicing computer scientist trained in AI, and I have managed to go viral on LinkedIn with my criticism of AI a few times (haha). I post pretty regularly on the fediverse about AI, usually critically though sometimes "philosophically" or politically.

Some blog posts:



Some fediverse posts:


I usually hashtag AI posts with #AI #GenAI #GenerativeAI especially to help anyone who wants to mute this stuff.

CC: @timnitGebru@dair-community.social @emilymbender@dair-community.social @alexhanna@peertube.dair-institute.org @DAIR@dair-community.social @cwebber@social.coop @jaredwhite@indieweb.social @tante@tldr.nettime.org

in reply to Anthony

@abucci thank you Anthony. Following you now and I've added you to my "AI Resistance" list
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

We could encourage people to use a consistent hashtag to anchor a community.

Your #NoAI is fine, if read as "there is no AI"

#NoAI
in reply to Eric Lawton

@EricLawton thank you Eric. Will find a better, more nuanced hashtag to use for this topic. Probably AIcritic ?
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

RE: mastodon.social/@Gargron/11620…

@_elena @timnitGebru @emilymbender @alexhanna @DAIR @cwebber @jaredwhite @tante

I'm sure you have seen this thread, and apologies if someone else has mentioned it here...

mastodon.online/@Gargron@masto…


Machine translations are often brought up as a gotcha whenever I criticize LLMs. It's worth pointing out two things: Machine translations existed decades before LLMs, and yes, machine translations are useful. However: I would never in my life read a machine translated book. Understanding what a social media post is talking about in rough terms? Sure. Literature? Absolutely not. Hell, have you ever seen machine translated subtitles? It's absolute garbage.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I do not post, follow those who do, nor boost slop.

I'm about to exit the tech industry after almost 30yrs because it's gone to utter dogshit... I've seen behind the curtains and I understand what they do with the data they collect... I try to discourage everyone from using any corpo owned platform... not just AI ones.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I'm not really pushing it with lots of written text, but I am going to put the fox among the chickens in a closing keynote I'm giving on Friday.
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I think @alex is better for Alex? Just boosted a couple recent posts about a UW lecture from 4 months ago.
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I publicly crash out against it about once a month if that’s your cup of tea 🤣

mastodon.social/@dimitribounio…

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

if you search my posts for 'so ai is going great' i post a ton of horror stories
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I’m anti LLM, but I’d hardly consider myself worth listening to…
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

Hi, I do that.

But also @glyph and @baldur (other than the ones you mentioned) these days.

This entry was edited (1 day ago)
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I hate LLM powered genAI because of how it was developed, why it was released, and how much environmental damage it causes. I hate the racism, sexism, and classism built into it. I hate how much the people funding it and championing it deride and belittle human creativity. I hate how they humanize a statistical token prediction engine while simultaneously demuhanizing actual people.

Other types of "AI" are not burdened with the same existential baggage even if they are used for the same types of war crimes. Machine learning, expert systems, neutral networks, all that other "AI" didn't take exploitation to the same level genAI has. They were always biased. That's documented. But the scale and the speed of genAI, the money being burned just as much as the fossil field, is almost unprecedented. Bitcoin and NFTs couldn't do it, but this bubble just might accelerate us over enough climate tipping points that we kill ourselves and 90% of the rest of all life. We are an extinction level event thanks to genAI.

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

am not in any way connected to work that involved #NoAI but i am and try to vocalize my vehement #FUCKAI vibes
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

I’d put myself on the list, giving regular talks and presentations at conferences and user groups.