Skip to main content

mastodon - Link to source

Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means. 🌐🌍

Share this & Spread the word!

#SaferInternetDay26 #SID

A safer internet IS MADE BY: Encryption Privacy Open source A safer internet is not made by: Age verification Scanning communication Tracking & data collection #Saferinternetday
#saferinternetday26 #sid
in reply to Tuta

Simon Zerafa (Status: 😊)
mastodon - Link to source
Simon Zerafa (Status: 😊)
• •
That second column isn't designed to make anything safer for the end user.
in reply to Tuta

Tuta
mastodon - Link to source
Tuta
• •
πŸ”— Protecting your safety online starts here: tuta.com/blog/minimum-password…

2024 NIST rules on minimum password length: Aim for 16 characters or more! | Tuta

With the rise of quantum computers, passwords need to be longer - and more complex. These tips help you secure your online accounts.
Tuta
in reply to Tuta

Ibi
mastodon - Link to source
Ibi
• •

For average user, a password manager will be necessary if every pwsd is so long.

Passkey is a good alternative, but how many service providers allow it is an issue.

in reply to Tuta

Poindex76
mastodon - Link to source
Poindex76
• •
I’ve been using unique 20-char random passwords for at least five years. Occasionally, I’ve run into a site where the limit is lower, and then I’ve thought a bit about whether I really need an account at such a poorly coded site. Nope!
in reply to Tuta

ΔžΓ–KΓœπŸ‘»πŸ‘»β„’
mastodon - Link to source
ΔžΓ–KΓœπŸ‘»πŸ‘»β„’
• •
we will ditch smart phones and services. Time to use dump keypad phones just for calls and msgs.. Lest flick these stupid companies together..
in reply to Tuta

LostLLM
mastodon - Link to source
LostLLM
• •
IYPS as one of the apps, where everyone can experiment and check password strength in offline mode. Android version: f-droid.org/en/packages/com.iy…

IYPS | F-Droid - Free and Open Source Android App Repository

Evaluate passwords, predict crack times, and get tips for stronger passwords.
f-droid.org
in reply to Tuta

Brainsuxx
mastodon - Link to source
Brainsuxx
• •
It's not about a safer internet it`s about collecting more data from us.
in reply to Tuta

Nuno Gomes
mastodon - Link to source
Nuno Gomes
• •
Just a note. Age verification is not mutually exclusive to everything that is on the safer column. If the real world has age requirements in some operations, it's acceptable that the digital world also has the same. Making the Internet lawless is what drives attacks on other liberties.
in reply to Tuta

Xela
mastodon - Link to source
Xela
• •
how about "content moderation by humans"? Seems important to me when it comes to any platform/software, where harassment could happen.
in reply to Tuta

Joost van Baal-Ilić
mastodon - Link to source
Joost van Baal-Ilić
• •
true! And maybe also: Properly trained human community managers, moderation teams, dispute resolution perssonel, ... ?
in reply to Tuta

Andrea
mastodon - Link to source
Andrea
• •
this way of thinking should become mainstream, but unfortunately we are far behind that in public debates.
in reply to Tuta

TC Won't Give In To Lies
mastodon - Link to source
TC Won't Give In To Lies
• •

You missed the most important one.

A safe internet require distributed and transparent ownership, not tight control by secretive for-profit companies.

Without that, none of the rest matters.

in reply to Tuta

Hacker
mastodon - Link to source
Hacker
• •
Without tracking and data collection recommendation algorithms would not work. And that's safer. Yes.
in reply to Tuta

gbsills
mastodon - Link to source
gbsills
• •
The graphic is correct for email. The Internet is more than just email.
in reply to Tuta

Edward
mastodon - Link to source
Edward
• •
and moderation for public communities, 4chan isnt exactly safe
in reply to Tuta

Dynom
mastodon - Link to source
Dynom
• •

short slogans are nice for marketing.

The Internet is not safer for victims of harassment, when the attackers enjoy anonymity and no accountability because of it.

Platforms can't abide by laws, if they can't figure out if their users are legally (of age) visiting.

Brevity isn't winning any arguments.

in reply to Tuta

Guillotine Jones, FlΓ’neur
mastodon - Link to source
Guillotine Jones, FlΓ’neur
• •
Safe internet or surveillance internet?
The choice is ours, unless governments take it away.
in reply to Tuta

abody
mastodon - Link to source
abody
• •
Does your solution support open standards like POP/IMAP, allowing the end users to encrypt/decrypt/verify their messages EXTERNALLY? If it does not, please stop using the word "safe" and the name of your product in the same sentence.
in reply to Tuta

Drew πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ ♾️
mastodon - Link to source
Drew πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ ♾️
• •
You keep using the word safer. I do not think it means what you think it means.
in reply to Tuta

Omnivore
mastodon - Link to source
Omnivore
• •

#alttext

A safer internet IS MADE BY
Encryption
Privacy
Open source

A safer internet is NOT MADE BY
Age verification
Scanning communication
Tracking & data collection

#SAFERINTERNETDAY

#AltText #saferinternetday
in reply to Tuta

RBuzz
mastodon - Link to source
RBuzz
• •
why age verification is not safe? Internet should be 35+ only. Because it destroys brain tissues with cat pictures.
in reply to Tuta

Andre 🌈
mastodon - Link to source
Andre 🌈
• •
the left column does not protect minors from AI Fake content, porn and violence. This is just the wrong sharepic for the conext
in reply to Tuta

Toni Aittoniemi
mastodon - Link to source
Toni Aittoniemi
• •

Besides.. Police already have the rights to go after pedos WHEN THEY HAVE WARRANT.

The essence here is that we remove probable cause, and we make everyone a suspect.

We used to be innocent until proven guilty. Now we have to prove our innocense.

in reply to Tuta

CafΓ©-Junkie
mastodon - Link to source
CafΓ©-Junkie
• •
@ErikUden
...fehlt aber noch....
βœ…Pro sicheres Internet: Dezentrale Services
❌Kontra sicheres Internet: LockIn bei (proprietÀren) zentralen Diensten.
🧐
@Erik Uden πŸ‘
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Tuta

ThΓ©odred Bizmpianos
mastodon - Link to source
ThΓ©odred Bizmpianos
• •
I would add parenting to the first column. Parents, it's not the governments job to police your children.
in reply to Tuta

Cress
mastodon - Link to source
Cress
• •
So much is unregulated from a safe internet perspective - for example what gives the right for companies to fingerprint and track us, to resell our data time and time again, to be scrapped into archives and are forever doing takedown requests, for large providers having zero recourse or accountability by regular people, without hiring billion dollar lawyers. Its all f*cked up! Where are the regulators???
in reply to Tuta

Lord Caramac the Clueless, KSC
mastodon - Link to source
Lord Caramac the Clueless, KSC
• •
Safe for whom? For users or for the billionaire cyberlords who want to rule and control us all?
in reply to Tuta

hpcomeaux3
mastodon - Link to source
hpcomeaux3
• •
the other method is for governments to control us
in reply to Tuta

Nuwagaba Gift
mastodon - Link to source
Nuwagaba Gift
• •
Are most people really willing to get a safe Internet?
in reply to Tuta

KiwiTB
mastodon - Link to source
KiwiTB
• •
so you will be releasing the source to your backend finally right?
in reply to Tuta

Thomas Frans πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
mastodon - Link to source
Thomas Frans πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
• •
And good parenting. If kids have access to Discord, that's the parent's fault.
in reply to Tuta

Koichi Izumi
mastodon - Link to source
Koichi Izumi
• •
I don't think open source means secure anymore. The code should be inspected by professionals
⇧