Skip to main content

mastodon - Link to source

"Peer review is imperfect, sometimes exclusionary, occasionally petty. We have all seen nonsensical reports and capricious delays. But the answer to those failings is to invest more in the human practice – through training, recognition and realistic expectation – not to hollow it out."
timeshighereducation.com/opini…

#ai #academicchatter #peerreview


AI is not a peer, so it can’t do peer review

If we still believe that science is a vocation grounded in argument, curiosity and care, we can’t delegate judgement to machines, says Akhil Bhardwaj
Akhil Bhardwaj (Times Higher Education (THE))
#ai #academicchatter #peerreview
in reply to Björn Brembs

El Duvelle
mastodon - Link to source
El Duvelle
• •
I do think it is very important to keep as many journals AI-free in their review process. I can guarantee that these will have a much higher reputation in the years to come compared to those who fall for the hype... and any reviewer caught to use genAI should be blacklisted. Maybe we can preserve some real science that way
⇧