As Eva Wiseman points out:
'while governments have an obsession with efficiency, its still limited solely to cost-cutting. There seems to be little interest in, for instance, making access to welfare payments more efficient or healthcare, or childcare... No, efficiency is only important when trying to maximise profit'!
efficiency defined by cost, rather than by effective practice(s);
we know the cost(s) off everything but the value of nothing!
theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2…
Striving for efficiency is all very well, but it leaves no time to live
Efficiency slices and barges its way through delicate structures, leaving the most vulnerable flailingEva Wiseman (The Guardian)
This entry was edited (6 days ago)
GeofCox
in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May • • •And it's not even accurately defined by cost, because it typically doesn't take into account how cuts in one area lead to lost revenue or more funding needs in others.
There have been many studies based on 'SROI' - Social return on Investment - particularly in the area of homelessness and mental health, showing that proper, and prompt support saves money, because it enables sufferers to stay in or go back to work, pay taxes their whole lives, use less medication and other government services, etc, etc.
Almost all 'public services' should really be viewed as social investment - education, health, transport, social housing, waste collection - whatever - it would be good to add utilities, as in most countries - are precisely the investments that enable everyone to work more productively, produce more wealth, pay more tax, etc...
Emeritus Prof Christopher May
in reply to GeofCox • • •David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May • • •GeofCox
in reply to David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*) • • •Expanding free school meals: a cost benefit analysis
Impact on Urban Healthreshared this
Aral Balkan reshared this.
Ben Curthoys
in reply to GeofCox • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Ben Curthoys • • •