Skip to main content

Wikipedia is gauging interest for an extension that uses AI to see if any claim is cited on Wikipedia

Content warning: Wikipedia is gauging interest for an extension that uses AI... #wikipedia #browser #extension #ai

#ai #wikipedia #browser #extension
in reply to Aatube

Even_Adder
Even_Adder
• •
Chrome extension only?
in reply to Even_Adder

Nomecks
Nomecks
• •
They're a non-profit and they're aiming for the largest possible market segment.
in reply to Even_Adder

Aatube
Aatube
• •

For now. Like I said, they're gauging interest in it for now, and it's currently basically a prototype. So kinda ironically, to support free knowledge, we've gotta inconvene (the proper verb is apparently "inconvenience"? sorry that's just too weird) and grovel to Google a bit. Someone can probably write a bs marketing passage about Google's auspices to supplant free knowledge through providing accessibility to a supernation of usuremongers.

Firefox conversion by-hand doesn't seem like it'll be that hard either, thanks to Manifest v3, which removed the stupid deviation from the standard of Chrome using callbacks instead of promises like everyone else does.

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Aatube

randomsnark
randomsnark
• •

"Inconvenience" would be the verb for causing an inconvenience. So in the sentence you're going for, "inconvene" would have to be replaced with the passive "be inconvenienced" ("we've gotta be inconvenienced and grovel to google a bit"). I don't believe we have a separate word for "endure an inconvenience", although it seems like the kind of thing some languages might have a single word for. Stylistically I'd probably restructure the sentence to "we've gotta put up with the inconvenience" rather than just using the passive verb, but yeah.

I think you'd most often see this verb in the stock phrase "Sorry to inconvenience you".

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Even_Adder

WilfordGrimley
WilfordGrimley
• •
These work perfectly on any chromium browser like Brave fyi.
in reply to Aatube

Ilandar
Ilandar
• •
Obviously Wikipedia is not a definitive or 100% accurate source but this sounds like a genuinely positive use of AI to combat misinformation. The people it really needs to reach likely won't use it but it's still a good idea.
in reply to Aatube

CanadaPlus
CanadaPlus
• •
Off topic, but has anyone noticed Wikipedia's starting to feel outdated in places? Way too often there's something that's "as of 2014".
in reply to Aatube

CanadaPlus
CanadaPlus
• •

Can you? I was under the impression it's gotten harder and harder to get things approved.

Edit: Huh, I guess that's just whole new articles.

⇧