Skip to main content

in reply to Patrick Leavy

I enjoyed this article, and I didn't know this and found it interesting:

> ... the advertising industry has been repeating since the days when it was waging a massive campaign against the TV remote on the grounds that people would "steal" TV by changing the channel when the ads came on.

I'm not very familiar with life before cable TV, but it seems especially offensive since cable TV is both paid and has a ton of ads. I hope this was at least before paid TV...

in reply to axby

@axby
When I was a little boy, in the 1960s, an issue of MAD magazine showed how to splice an on-off switch on a long wire to the feed to your TV speaker. DIY ad mute button.

The article mentioned how smug you'll feel defeating a TV ad that took millions of dollars to make with a 15 cent switch.

@axby
in reply to Winchell Chung ⚛🚀

@nyrath @axby
Can confirm! I made one of these for my mother’s TV using parts from an electronics surplus store. Mine used a variometer with an “off” setting, so we could (gasp!) adjust the volume or mute the TV.

The scene around phreaking/hacking had an Abbie Hoffman vibe in those days.

reshared this

in reply to Winchell Chung ⚛🚀

@nyrath @axby My dad built his own Heathkit valve-based (vacuum tubes) TV and later hooked up a 'commercial killer' switch. My mother's sister complained during one visit that this was antithetical to the American way, and that we should be listening to the advertisements because they were paying for the shows. The brainwashing runs deep.
in reply to Patrick Leavy

@Patrick Leavy @Cory Doctorow Wasn't Apple collecting that information themselves behind the scenes regardless of the setting?

Your point still stands though.

in reply to Patrick Leavy

from conversations I've had it's definitely a lot of feeling helpless that your privacy will be ignored regardless so might as well go along
in reply to tova

@mouszi yeah that apathy is really depressing. Where is the outrage?

Dave Eggers' book The Every is looking painfully accurate 😬😒

@tova
in reply to Patrick Leavy

the outrage came and went when it didn't change much. when you think of how many erosions of privacy there have been that were pushed through and became the new norm it tracks. there's also not many levers for the average person to pull to do anything
in reply to tova

@mouszi you're right, #bigtech just rides it out, lobbies, and we begrudgingly accept a new norm. 😒

They are boiling the frog 🐸. What will it take to make us jump out of the pot?
Another Cambridge Analytica?

in reply to Patrick Leavy

I don't think Cambridge Analytica moved the needle for th average person tbh. seeing a legislator pass something with real impact that's not just another "what about the kids" bill that also errodes privacy would be a good start
in reply to tova

@mouszi but it will need a scandal otherwise the 'security services + big tech' will block it.

Or it takes a few people at regulatory bodies with REAL integrity.

Cory Doctorow wrote a great essay about how the Irish have been shamefully protecting big tech. As an Irishman myself that was hard to read, but it was a wake up call:
https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/15/finnegans-snooze/#dirty-old-town

@tova