Skip to main content


From @pluralistic

"The question isn’t merely “How do we elect better leaders?” It’s “How do we make our leaders follow us?” Today’s Democrats are unserious quislings who keep bringing a squirt-gun to a mass-casualty assault-rifle spree-shooting. If we want Congressional Democrats to form a Nuremburg Caucus and start holding hearings on who they’re going to put in the dock when the Trump regime collapses, we’re going to have to drive them to it.”

#politics #fascism

doctorow.medium.com/https-plur…

in reply to Brian Gordon

You will never get the leaders to do what you or the people want. If so, they wouldn't be leaders, but rather delegates in a state-less society. The masters tools won't destroy the masters house...
in reply to Papa Exmatrikulatus 🏴🏳️‍🌈

@Papaexmatrikulatus Holy shit is this a dumb take.

How do you explain the post-war eruption of welfare states around the world? Were those leaders serving the wealthy and powerful?

Whence came the New Deal? Was that FDR doing millionaires' bidding?

Was Tommy Douglas a craven lickspittle of capital?

in reply to Cory Doctorow

@Papaexmatrikulatus Moreover, this is the kind of cheap cynicism that robs your comrades of hope for change. Every time you say nonsense like this in public, you make life worse for everyone.
in reply to Cory Doctorow

@Papaexmatrikulatus And OBVIOUSLY the master's tools can disassemble the master's house. The master's tools have all the right bits to fit the screws that are holding it up.
in reply to Cory Doctorow

Wow... for you, it is a dumb take. You obviously don't understand the logic of power and hierarchy.

Ok, i'll give you that: You can pressure the elite enough, so that they partially give into your demands. In Germany, the welfare system was launched under Bismarck, but he also persecuted socialists and didn't start socialism in Germany.
Welfare states after the war: ok, yes i see your argument. (1/3)

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Papa Exmatrikulatus 🏴🏳️‍🌈

But by not changing the system in a meaningful way (capitalism and state), the rich could stay rich and get richer over time by the means of exploitation and lobbying the leaders. And that's how we got to neoliberalism and concentration of wealth and power especially from the 70s and 80s onwards.
This is not to discourage people, who want change, but to critizise the notion that you can use the tools of power to build a better world in the long run. (2/3)
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Papa Exmatrikulatus 🏴🏳️‍🌈

The question for me is: Why should we endlessly try to pressure leaders, who don't have our interests at heart by default and just physically can't consider every angle in our inherently complex world, when we could also try to build something new together, were nobody has power over other people (or we try at least) and everyone has a voice... (3/3)
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Papa Exmatrikulatus 🏴🏳️‍🌈

And i mean, the New Deal was also a massive subsidy for the Economy of the USA, which was owned by which class of people? This is not really an example that clearly helps your case.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Papa Exmatrikulatus 🏴🏳️‍🌈

@Papaexmatrikulatus Again, this is a dogshit, pig-ignorant take. The New Deal was the single most redistributive program in American history and it substantially reduced the wealth and power of the richest Americans.

The reason the New Deal was good for the American economy is that oligarchy is bad for any economy.

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Yes, sry i confused the New Deal with the Marshall Plan somehow. Oops.

But still: Granted, that the New Deal bettered the material condition of many poor people and raised taxes significantly on the rich, it still stabilized the capitalist, hierarchical system. In the longer run, this system was still highly suscebtible to the 'wrong people', who used the advantage in power and wealth to gradually cement themselves at the top and reverse the policies of the New Deal.

in reply to Cory Doctorow

Looks like someone earned my block today (hint: it’s not either of you)