Skip to main content


Just a few days after I said I enjoyed the look of Shōgun because it didn’t look like the standard streaming gruel, we have this piece. The headline/framing on this is weird—on Shōgun the image is certainly stylized, but it’s not like they blew the focus. It’s a shame, because there are so many fascinating details here that you could have easily just positioned this as “why Shōgun looks so unique.”

https://www.theringer.com/tv/2024/4/8/24124015/shogun-cinematography-tv-background-blur-anamorphic-lens-effect

#tv

#TV
in reply to Mark Llobrera

This is connected in my brain to the growing trend of people shooting diffusion filters (like Moment’s Cinebloom) on digital to soften the clinical look—to the point that Ricoh is releasing a GR variant with a built in diffusion filter:

https://www.dpreview.com/news/0569067557/ricoh-gr-iii-gr-iix-hdr-highlight-diffusion-filter?utm_source=self-desktop&utm_medium=marquee&utm_campaign=traffic_source

in reply to Mark Llobrera

I’m not convinced that the look of Shōgun works all the time—it can be distracting, but I also feel like folks are lumping a disagreement over style with a different class of problem, which is audio/video that is hard to hear/see (the article mentions this, but again…the framing feels off).
in reply to Mark Llobrera

This is all annoying to me because Shōgun and Ripley are two of the few things that have actually interested me (on a purely visual level) in the streaming space
in reply to Mark Llobrera

Oh! And we’re not that far removed from the numerous (positive) writeups about the cinematography choices for The Batman, where they were doing a very similar thing conceptually https://nofilmschool.com/why-does-batman-look-so-gorgeous-and-how-you-can-copy

#tv #film

#Film #TV
in reply to Mark Llobrera

Content warning: twitter link


(Nitter addon enabled: Twitter links via https://nitter.privacytools.io)