Skip to main content


People tell me that #AI code is fine, because you can run automatic tests. But tests can only tell you if code is doing the thing you want it to do.

To know what it SHOULD do, we used to have requirements. But now requirements are themselves vibe-coded slopotypes.

People were hoping that this would get them higher velocity, but testing the requirements in production only produces waste and risk.

To test requirements safely, you need a culture of critique.

productpicnic.beehiiv.com/p/ch…

#LLM #UX

#ai #ux #llm

Pavel A. Samsonov reshared this.

in reply to Pavel A. Samsonov

With #llm we now also need to test if it does (or might do) anything beside the things dit is supposee to do.
#llm
in reply to Pavel A. Samsonov

I’ve been following your blog with rss for a couple of weeks now, it is so refreshing to read. I feel like senior devs like myself are aware of the negatives of AI but nearly everyone has turned into zombies that are on the hype train. Thank you for sharing these thoughtful (and well written) blog posts, they are a breath of fresh air. Hopefully your posts help move the needle back in the other direction, we need more voices like yours.
⇧