Skip to main content


People ask: "Why the preoccupation with #Bluesky? Lots of good folks are going there and love it."

@Daojoan does a great job of providing the long answer in this brilliant piece: joanwestenberg.com/big-tech-wa…

But the short answer is that, by funneling users onto another unsafe centralized corporate platform, #Bluesky inhibits the construction of truly defensible public social media.

So now, when something happens over on Bluesky, the Fedi will not be ready to absorb a rapid mass migration.

more...

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Mastodon Migration

In essence #Bluesky is a trap, a Potemkin village with an appealing facade, but behind the false exterior it's the same old centralized corporate walled garden (journals.plos.org/plosone/arti…). Users now have the illusion of reach and freedom, but that can be denied at a moment's notice. Alternatively, it can be suppressed gradually, and they may not even know it.

And all the while users are building their corporate prison, they are not engaged in fortifying a defensible public resource.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)