Skip to main content


When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)

reshared this

in reply to Aral Balkan

Moi je continuerai d'utiliser Instagram. J'y ai toutes les informations en live sur ce qui se passe actuellement au #Liban . Ce qui n'est pas le cas ici ni dans nos médias.
in reply to Aral Balkan

I'm actually writing a blog post arguing that public institutions should start seeing the Fediverse as the ideal publishing platform for sharing communications with their constituents.

May I quote your post, this is super relevant?

in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

in europe, public organisations are taking care of much of the necessary infrastructure like railroads and roads. To make it possible for citizens to have easy and free access to decentralized digital platforms, european governments could host those servers themselves professionally. That would also take the burden off private volunteers working their buts off to keep servers in the air with all expenses connected. And so, decentralized services could also become more sustainable.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Elena Rossini ⁂

@_elena
Count me in. I work for local govt and with national govt, so very keen to promote this. Using Fediverse ad hoc for specific projects at moment
@aral
in reply to Aral Balkan

This also seems to be a thing on Bsky, although there it’s opt-in. Which means that people actively decide to exclude people not on the same platform. Seems to be considered a feature, not a bug. 🤷
in reply to Aral Balkan

It's like paywalls only less honestly - meta takes your money less obviously by selling your life info, x makes you enable Nazis.
in reply to Aral Balkan

That’s why I post to micro.blog and then share a link to my post instead
in reply to Aral Balkan

Pro tip:
Swap x.com for xcancel.com (including the rest of the URL) and it’ll load the tweet and replies without being logged in.

The same thing works (with less reliability) by swapping instagram.com with imginn.com (again, keeping the rest of the URL).

I use Apple Shortcuts to do these actions automatically:
Twitter: icloud.com/shortcuts/06a82b30a…
Instagram: icloud.com/shortcuts/37da2bbbc…

in reply to Aral Balkan

Great stuff. If they post on there then I have to assume they don't want me to know what they have to say.
And I really don't like to see mirrors of their posts on Mastodon so they can shout and they don't see any replies.
in reply to Aral Balkan

Thank you for saying this Aral. I often wonder how to point out to folks who post links to exclusive platforms, that this excludes me. And anyone else who takes a stance and refuses to use those platforms...
in reply to Aral Balkan

@vicfroh And this is what posting to Imgur looks like in the UK, because UK privacy law is just strict enough that that it isn't worth Imgur's bandwidth to serve non-targetted ads.
in reply to Aral Balkan

it’s Schrödinger's content. If you login to view it, the quantum superposition collapses and you discover it either doesn’t exist, or that it wasn’t worth the effort because of the rest of the garbage on those platforms.
in reply to Aral Balkan

any business "website" that is just a Facebook page is an instant fail and no longer an option for me. Being pestered to create an account just check opening hours, what a great experience that is for new customers.
in reply to Aral Balkan

I just pass now. I have ancient accounts but offloaded the apps. Isn’t worth the hassle anymore. I’ll interact with people that have a social conscience instead.
in reply to Aral Balkan

And this is what public #Mastodon posts look like!

Even viewed from a 3rd instance it's still fully visible without account

Basically on each server with public timelines etc so tens of thousands of places

in reply to Kelson

@kelson In that case there is RSS or a client like bloat I believe
in reply to Aral Balkan

Tbh, I just use it as an excuse to not go any further, which usually ends up helping my blood pressure.
in reply to Aral Balkan

At least for Twitter, this is not true. Yeah, the page exhorts you to create an account - but it *does* show the post. At least on desktop; maybe it's different on mobile.
in reply to VessOnSecurity

I guess my screenshot tool was lying.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Aral Balkan

Your screenshot is from mobile, mine is from desktop. That's why I supposed that the two may be offering different kinds of access.
in reply to VessOnSecurity

@bontchev Yep. And it’s possible they have heuristics for when they show the doorslam and when they don’t.
in reply to Aral Balkan

Shit like this make me wonder why this alone hasn’t lead to a giant user revolt and exodus years ago. Like, this should be completely disqualifying.
The whole point of "social media" goes out of the window if ALL posts are locked away (usually against the user’s wishes btw).

These terrible private billionaire playgrounds cannot crumble fast enough.

in reply to Aral Balkan

perfect example of why public agencies should not be using those as their primary press release forum.
in reply to Aral Balkan

I don't listen to some podcasts I like anymore because they only use this platforms to stay in contact with listeners. So if you can not comment without account why should you listen to it - it must be an extraordinary high quality podcast with very important content where no comment is needed at all.
in reply to Aral Balkan

I understand where you're coming from, but since I regularly follow links and end up reading posts on X, Instagram and FB (though I might have to dismiss a popup), I know you have half a point. Sensitive content might be hidden, but I've never run in to an example. Admittedly I use this old thing called a laptop. YMMV on a smartphone.
in reply to Aral Balkan

It's even simpler. If you post on those platforms, I'll never see the post, as I decided long ago that twitter and facebook (now X, facebook, and instagram) don't need my traffic, ever. If it's important or ugly enough, I'm sure someone will screenshot it and repost, but you (and more importantly, the oligarchs) won't get my tracking or ad revenues.
in reply to Aral Balkan

I don't even try to click. That's a lost post. Not interested
in reply to Aral Balkan

Yeah. The walled gardens (to use a phrase) have gone from picket, to latiss, to blackout.

Not that the Fedi doesnt have a wall here or there. But that is usually, hopefully, for saftey. And not to exclude to draw in.

Also, I'll note people research twitter frontends. I cant find one for insta tho.

in reply to Aral Balkan

i keep asking my sister to stop sending me Facebook posts bc of this
in reply to Aral Balkan

For Twitter at least, you change "x.com" to the domain of a Nitter instance, like "xcancel.com".
in reply to Aral Balkan

people can use xcancel to get around that from x... but why? Using it still drives traffic to the site, and in fact inflates their numbers since xcancel needs continuously made new accounts to act as the proxies. Just wean yourself off these sites IMO.