First of all what is “culture”?
We humans have borders that divide us into tribes. The rules of the division are not always clear. Language? But USA and Australia speak the same language…
Same is the case for South Africa, England, Sudan, Botswana, Nigeria, Singapore, Namibia or Ghana. And some 100 more tribes:
French? Some 50 tribes speak French!
The fact is that there are many tribes that speak the same language yet their cultures can be totally different.
So what makes a “culture” is a soup of traditions, beliefs, religion, food, knowledge, art, clothing style, humor, sport, and so on.
A cluster of values that makes a group of people a bit different from another.
In that sense cultures are not only limited by borders and tribes, but they can form around a topic of interest such as gaming, movies, even celebrities.
Snippet from Culture Cancer - tromsite.com/2026/07/culture-c…
Bernard Marks
in reply to TROM • • •Culture is downstream from race. This is why all European peoples, be they in US, Australia, or elsewhere have similar cultures. Africans everywhere also have cultures more similar to each other than to Europeans.
Although people may mimic or adopt cultures of another race, they cannot create or improve those cultures. Culture is created amongst a homogeneous population. Some people are capable of producing high culture and civilization from it.
Culture is lost when it is mixed into other cultures. If you take all the colorful crayons in a box and melt them together, you get an ugly grey.
Valvoline
in reply to Bernard Marks • • •sir, your assumption that no culture can be improved by another is historically false. The history of colonization is a story of the spreading knowledge and culture around the world. Local cultures were improved by this.
Are you telling me Jazz or Blues or even Rock and Roll have no value? They were born from cultural clash.
The California Roll would not exist without a Japanese sushi chef trying to sell to Americans. Now famous around the world. Is this not culture?
ProfessorTom
in reply to Valvoline • • •Bernard Marks
Unknown parent • • •Denying the existence of races within any species is like denying different breeds of dogs within the same species of canis familiaris. The differences between a greyhound and a chihuahua are both easily observable and genetically measurable.
You need not get tangled up in taxa used in current taxonomy (species, formenkreis, race, breed..), but that is an interesting topic covered very well in this book. z-lib.sk/book/69NK8Wy7zY/race-…
Russian and Spanish culture are indeed different, but they are different races with different admixtures. Under the caucasoid race, the subrace Europid has 4 subraces: celtic, germanic, baltic, and slavic.
Spanish are largely germanic with some celtic from the Visigoths who conquered the celtic people a long time ago. During the long occupation of the moors, some limited mixing with arabs (a mixed race people) occurred.
Russia was mostly slavic but was often ruled by germanic people such as vikings who mix
... Show more...Denying the existence of races within any species is like denying different breeds of dogs within the same species of canis familiaris. The differences between a greyhound and a chihuahua are both easily observable and genetically measurable.
You need not get tangled up in taxa used in current taxonomy (species, formenkreis, race, breed..), but that is an interesting topic covered very well in this book. z-lib.sk/book/69NK8Wy7zY/race-…
Russian and Spanish culture are indeed different, but they are different races with different admixtures. Under the caucasoid race, the subrace Europid has 4 subraces: celtic, germanic, baltic, and slavic.
Spanish are largely germanic with some celtic from the Visigoths who conquered the celtic people a long time ago. During the long occupation of the moors, some limited mixing with arabs (a mixed race people) occurred.
Russia was mostly slavic but was often ruled by germanic people such as vikings who mixed with them. They have had much mixing with the mongoloid race. Mongols and Huns conquered and occupied Russia at times and mixed with them for example.
Despite these differences in subraces and some non-Europid admixture, Russian culture and civilization is much more similar to the Spanish than it is to any culture you find in Africa or East Asia.
Some people are indeed more racially pure than others. Most capoids have never bred with congoids/negrids. Some celts have never bred with germanics to make them still purely celtic. I can trace my lineage to celtic and germanic which makes me nordic under Europid.
If you moved all the people from Japan to the Congo and moved all the people of the Congo to Japan, what would both places look like afterwards? The Congo would have beautiful temples, art, literature, and civilization similar to current Japan. The island of Japan would look more like Haiti.
Don't deny what you can easily observe because it may disagree with your ideology. Don't deny the findings of genetics that further prove what causes the difference between populations of humans.
Bernard Marks
Unknown parent • • •Yes there are many examples of genocide when one people overwhelms another:
The ancient Beringians (native Americans) were wiped out by the mongoloid Amerindians. beringia.club/m/the-beringian-…
Mongols erased entire races and civilizations or severely genocided them as in Russia.
The list is endless and is simply history. Land belongs to those who are strong enough to take it and determined enough to hold onto it.
The Beringian Story | Beringians
beringia.clubBernard Marks
Unknown parent • • •Caleb James DeLisle
Unknown parent • • •> There is no other race than the human race.
I love this line because it actually runs contrary to Darwin's theory AT IT'S CORE.
In short, Darwin discovered that species undergo random mutations which make the more or less evolutionarily fit, and some flourish while others die out - leading to an "evolution" of the species.
Concretely this means that any given mutation "splits" a species into those which have it and those which don't. If the mutation is eugenic, then those with it compete better, if it's dysgenic then it's the other way.
If the human species is subject to mutations, then it has "splits", which means there are different "groups" (i.e. races). If it's not, then you don't believe in evolution.
ergo
in reply to Caleb James DeLisle • • •werent neanderthals considered a whole other species, yet they could have offspring with homo sapiens, and thats why we have neanderthal DNA in us.
They probably also looked more similar to me than an australian aborigine