Skip to main content


As I posted recently, the continuned growth of mastodon.social is putting the #Fediverse in danger (here's why: fedi.tips/its-a-really-bad-ide…).

The quickest, easiest and most effective way to solve this would be if the official apps stopped promoting mastodon.social, and instead promoted a rotating selection from a pool of reliable servers with solid track records.

If you're comfortable using Github, please give thumbs up to both these issues:
- github.com/mastodon/mastodon-a…
- github.com/mastodon/mastodon-i…

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Tips πŸŽ„

p.s. To avoid repetition of replies:

-If people forget name of server they signed up on, it's written on the email they received when they signed up.

-Mastodon.social is in no way more reliable or easier than other servers with similar or better track records.

-If Mastodon gGmbH does not trust anyone else to run a server properly, why should anyone else trust Mastodon gGmbH to run a server properly? "Trust me, but I won't trust you" is a terrible argument in a collaborative project.

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips πŸŽ„

It looks like you've been championing this issue for years now, but I didn't see any of the main people working on Mastodon address it. Is there a way you could get a direct response from them on why Mastodon.social (the instance they own) is the "default" instance on the app?
in reply to Luigi.exe (Dragonheart System)

the reason they give for defaulting to dot social in the app is they claim it's easier to guarantee a "good" mastodon experience for new users if they control the server they're recommending they sign up for. They don't want to take the time to vet what other servers are reliable to recommend. While I get their logic, I don't agree with it. I know a lot of people have a hard time picking a reliable server on their own (it's easier if you have friends already on an instance and you join them), and I've even moved servers a couple times because of reliability issues (I started this account on dot social before it was the default, transferred to a couple other masto servers before I moved to Firefish, which the flagship instance went down in flames, and I'm on my second misskey variant instance since). It takes time and effort to vet which servers are reliable with good moderation teams, and the mastodon team doesn't want to put their resources there, regardless of if they're right or wrong.
@FediTips@social.growyourown.services
in reply to Glowing Cat of the Nuclear Wastelands

@deathkitten
Paradoxically, by letting the instance they own balloon in size, they have to pour more and more resources into maintaining it.

So regardless, they have to spend more resources, and they chose to spend resources that's leading to the Fediverse being more centralized.

in reply to Luigi.exe (Dragonheart System)

@Eeveecraft @deathkitten

Yup, it is concerning if some of the donations and grants given to Mastodon gGmbH are spent on centralising the Fediverse by funding mastodon.social.

in reply to Luigi.exe (Dragonheart System)

@Eeveecraft

I am not one of the people who attacks Eugen personally, he's done more than anyone to popularise the Fediverse, we owe him. I don't agree with people who attack him.

But he doesn't really respond to criticism, and for some reason none of the others at Mastodon gGmbH respond about this issue either.

The only action Masto gGmbH has taken in response to my posts about this is banning me from trending on mastodon.social (that's why FediTips posts don't ever trend there any more).

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Fedi.Tips πŸŽ„

Sensitive content

in reply to Still Nmyownworld

@Still_Nimmy @Eeveecraft I've been considering moving from mastodon.social for awhile, I just never could figure out out which server to switch to. I guess I should start looking more seriously now.
in reply to Anson

@ansonkennedy

If you just want one suggestion a very similar and equally reliable alternative large alternative would be mas.to

If you want a selection of good medium-sized servers to choose from, you can find some at fedi.garden all of which are human-curated and have to be compatible with certain requirements listed at fedi.garden/about-this-site/

in reply to Fedi.Tips πŸŽ„

@ansonkennedy

What's your opinion of .world? I picked this cause someone I was interested in was here, but didn't give it any thought. It's absolutely default, and reliable. The "default" is bad cause it's only 500 character toot limit, but otherwise, it works well.

in reply to lxskllr

One of the (many) reasons I'm on @sharkey.world and not @mastodon.world. My char limit is 5432. Everything else is like a pretty version of Mastodon, but with extra functionality.

@FediTips@social.growyourown.services @ansonkennedy@mastodon.social

⇧