Even EFF has been raising the alarm about HR 7888. The problem seems to be something called the Turner-Himes amendment.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/16/house-fisa-government-surveillance-senate

While the Turner-Himes amendment lists some business types that are excepted from the requirement to help spy – like dwellings and restaurants – an almost limitless number of entities that provide wifi or just have access to Americans’ devices could be roped into the government’s surveillance operations. Using the wifi in your dentist office, hiring a cleaner who has access to your laptop, or even storing communications equipment in an office you rent could all expose you to increased risk of surveillance.\
\
The Turner-Himes amendment would also make it harder to push back on abusive surveillance practices, including those targeting first amendment rights. Take, for example, the surveillance of journalists. Big tech companies may sometimes resist government orders to spy on news outlets. They command armies of lawyers, receive Section 702 orders frequently, and have a commercial incentive to at least appear to care about their customers’ privacy concerns. But what hope could a news organization have that its cleaning crew, for instance, will want to take on the federal government on its behalf?

https://rules.house.gov/bill/118/hr-PIH-RISA

Remedies a serious intelligence loophole by narrowly updating the definition of electronic communication service provider under Section 702.

Apparently it's not so narrow.