Kids can be subjected to harmful 'conversion therapy,’ U.S. Supreme Court rules, court saying conversion therapy is basically protected 1st amendment speech since it is primarily "talking."
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, on Transgender Day of Visibility, struck down Colorado’s ban on so-called “conversion therapy” for minors. The decision elevates abstract free-speech doctrine over a growing body of medical evidence and leaves LGBTQ+ youth more exposed to a practice doctors have long described as harmful. The Court ruled 8–1, with a broad majority, including two liberal justices, joining the opinion striking down the law, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting.
Colorado argued that conversion therapy is not merely an expression but a form of clinical intervention — one associated, major medical groups say, with depression, anxiety, and increased suicide risk. The Court was unpersuaded and concluded that the Constitution does not allow the government to decide which messages may be delivered in a therapist’s office.
🔗 Kids can be subjected to harmful 'conversion therapy,’ U.S. Supreme Court rules #News #SCOTUS #USPol
It's a stunning setback for #LGBTQ+ young people who are put at significant risk for harm by this decision.
advocate.com/news/scotus-rejec…
States cannot ban harmful 'conversion therapy,' SCOTUS rules
It's a stunning setback for LGBTQ+ young people who are put at significant risk for harm by this decision.Christopher Wiggins (Advocate.com)
volkris
in reply to Paul Chambers🚧 • • •No, that's the opposite of what the opinion said.
Kids cannot be subject to harmful conversion therapy according to the opinion. The state has every right to regulate such therapy, if you want to call it therapy, and the opinion is clear about that.
The only thing the opinion says is not allowed is censorship. Everything else is on the table.