I expect there will be quite a lot of pushback for some, since there are some strong (sadly negative) opinions about Bluesky. But I would be thrilled by it. I believe there are also so many people like me who are active both on Fedi and Bluesky (at varying levels of course) because, well, people and friends who have migrated away from the Twitanic mostly went to Bsky. So facilitating interaction with them would definitely be fantastic (I say this while completely ignoring the immense workload this represents, simply to explore the idea).
@FiXato Development will affect the time dedicated for the current development and also the fact to maintain this part. If most fedilab users don't use or don't want to have BlueSky, I will not try to implement that support.
How big is your development team, and is it willing to support a corporate platform that hasn't stated yet how they will make their investors happy, in the future?
I'm not against it out of principle but there are way to many things to support for the Fediverse and adding BS support would necessarily take time away from better fedifeatures. Personally, I wouldn't use it anyway
Results are currently for a non-go but your comments make things even clearer about your opinion. I will of course respect your choice and put my time to the development that matches your expectations.
@marnic J'ai eu plein de retours avec des commentaires sur le fait d'éviter un tel investissement de temps dans l'app. Ça ne se fera pas apparemment :)
In a way, it's unfortunate that Bluesky support is being voted down. Fedilab could be a good alternative client for blind Bluesky users. I tried the official Bluesky Android app. Much of users' post text in the feed view is not read by Talkback, and there seems to be no way to swipe over to the main menu. Fedilab would provide a more accessible experience.
Won't accept compromises for supporting any platform outside the fediverse. If they want to partake they can incorporate fediverse connectors or bridges on their own.
But also no active hindering other platforms incorporate such connectors as long as they don't exploit flaws or bring unwanted nor unbearable stress to the fediverse. Keeping those connectors functional is no duty for the fediverse and its development, though.
Tony Hoyle
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Yamakyu
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •noodlejetski :verified_gay:
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Franz Graf
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Mux2000 (multi-track)
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •FediVerseExplorer
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •FiXato
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Fedilab Apps
in reply to FiXato • • •Development will affect the time dedicated for the current development and also the fact to maintain this part.
If most fedilab users don't use or don't want to have BlueSky, I will not try to implement that support.
🚲 L'aaaaphabbbbet ᓚᘏᗢ
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Yes but enclosed or something
anyway, i'm on almost every social thing for various purpose
except X
blaue_Fledermaus
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •katzenberger
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Silmathoron ⁂
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Personally, I wouldn't use it anyway
Fedilab Apps
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •I will of course respect your choice and put my time to the development that matches your expectations.
李晓猫猫(Mastodon)
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Dave :koeln: :verialt:
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •So probably not worth the work from my perspective
Phil Wolff
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •MAgetröte
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Marnic
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Marnic
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Fedilab Apps
in reply to Marnic • • •J'ai eu plein de retours avec des commentaires sur le fait d'éviter un tel investissement de temps dans l'app. Ça ne se fera pas apparemment :)
Hannes Hauswedell
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Juan
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •phi1997
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Dan Keck
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •U.Lancier
in reply to Fedilab Apps • • •Won't accept compromises for supporting any platform outside the fediverse. If they want to partake they can incorporate fediverse connectors or bridges on their own.
But also no active hindering other platforms incorporate such connectors as long as they don't exploit flaws or bring unwanted nor unbearable stress to the fediverse. Keeping those connectors functional is no duty for the fediverse and its development, though.