Skip to main content


WTAF!?

#SteveBannon wins #SCOTUS order likely to lead to dismissal of his #criminal #conviction for refusing to #Congress.

“Prodded” [instructed] by the #Trump admin, the justices threw out an appellate ruling upholding Bannon’s conviction for defying a #subpoena from the #House committee that investigated the #Jan6, 2021 #insurrection by Trump supporters.

#law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower
apnews.com/article/supreme-cou…

in reply to Nonilex

Looking at the ongoing process from the other side of the pond, it still looks like Americans are sitting quietly still and hoping that the judges will ultimately save their democracy — all the while a) judges side more and more often with the government for one reason or another, and b) TrumPutin’s government don't give a damn about city orders in any case.
in reply to Tommi Nieminen

@tomminieminen

A lot of Americans may be hoping judges will save democracy, but that's based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how the US government is structured.

In the US, judges don't have such power or authority. Their branch is intentionally restrained, with authority put in the hands of the other branches more directly answerable to the people.

It's mainly up to Congress, the representatives we elect, to save democracy on our behalf. We need to elect better congresspeople, but too many give them a pass by focusing on the courts.

in reply to Nonilex

The move frees a trial judge to act on the #Trump admin’s pending request to dismiss Bannon’s conviction & indictment “in the interests of justice” [rewriting history].

The dismissal would be largely symbolic. #SteveBannon served a 4-month prison term after a #jury #convicted him of #contempt of #Congress in 2022. A federal appeals court in Washington upheld the conviction.

#SCOTUS #law #SeparationOfPowers #LegislativeBranch #oversight #ChecksAndBalances #SubpoenaPower

in reply to Nonilex

The #DOJ brought the case against Bannon during Democrat Joe Biden’s presidency, but it changed course after #Trump took office again last year.

#SteveBannon had initially argued that his testimony was protected by Trump’s claim of #ExecutivePrivilege. But the #House panel & the DOJ contended such a claim was dubious because Trump had fired Bannon…in 2017 & he was thus a private citizen when consulting with Trump in the run-up to the #Jan6 #insurrection.

#SCOTUS #law #Congress #oversight

in reply to Nonilex

That's not an accurate reading of the order.

The lower court could have always acted on the request to dismiss; this doesn't free it to do so.

Instead, this tells the lower court that it has to at least address the issues raised in the request. They're really weighty issues, too, so it's not largely symbolic. They stand to have broader application far outside of Bannon.

Now the lower court can deny the request, but it has to at least consider it.