Skip to main content

in reply to Aral Balkan

That escalated quickly. From one protest in Germany being broken up to an EU-wode comment.

In the article, it's clear that languages can be used at protests, if there is an interpreter ...to ensure there's no incitement to terrorism. IMO, that's a worthy goal - and a reasonable limitation.

This group knew the law, chose not to have an interpreter (altho it seems it had many polyglots) and got the inevitable result. To me, it seems like they were aiming for a headline.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to TCatLikesReality

@TCatInReality "You're only allowed to speak if the cops can understand what you're saying" sounds super reasonable to me.

@aral

in reply to Aral Balkan

@freakazoid
Literally the same?

Sure, they're both about intel gathering. But one is a restriction on private communications. The other is a restriction on public, group protest events.

Reasonable people can disagree whether diff rules should apply.

For example, write "FIRE!" on a piece of paper and mail it to a neighbor. The response will be very diff from shouting it in a crowd.

in reply to TCatLikesReality

@TCatInReality @freakazoid Yeah, so, I’m on the police shouldn’t be able to stop you speaking your language side of this debate. And, sure, let’s agree to disagree.
in reply to Charles U. Farley

@freakazoid @TCatInReality I dunno man. 'You're entitled to free speech, but only if I can monitor you to my satisfaction' does not actually seem that reasonable to me.
in reply to Charles U. Farley

@freakazoid
Assuming you think incitement to violence is not protected speech, I'm not sure why that's an issue.

If you think it is protected, then I'm outta here.

in reply to TCatLikesReality

Are you seriously equating the police not understanding something with that something being inherently suspect?
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Aral Balkan

@TCatInReality Yeah, "we're not going to let you say anything unless we can be certain everything you say is actually protected speech" doesn't actually sound better.
in reply to Aral Balkan

@freakazoid
I am not.

But surely we can agree that if one wanted to incite violence in public, speaking in a language unknown to the police is super convenient.

I'm not saying it's a good law, and I'm often critical of overpolicing. Still, it's not unreasonable for police to want to close that loophole in a limited way.

This law does NOT ban speaking in Irish anywhere. It's targeted and there's an accommodation offered (interpreters). There are much bigger dangers.

in reply to TCatLikesReality

@TCatInReality
Which law exactly? No singing in foreign languages the police doesn't speak or understand?
in reply to Glitzersachen.de

@TCatInReality
I'll answer to myself, since TCat doesn't know and rather wants to "move on" now, after I asked for chapter and verse of the law.

The rule in question seems to be the "Berlin Freedom of Assembly Act" (approx 2020) which, interesting enough, further constrains the right of assembly as guaranteed by the Grundgesetz. I stll have my doubts if a federal country can do that. But I'd like to point out that the GG Article 8 only guarantees the right of assembly to all _Germans_.

in reply to Glitzersachen.de

@TCatInReality
So assemblies by non-Germans are just permitted on sufferance ... which gives the police a lot of leeway do everything they want with assemblies by expatriates, fugitives, immigrants. Exactly the groups where you would anyway expect 100% neutral objectivity by German police.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Aral Balkan

Well, if they were singing Irish Rugby Songs, I'm not surprised.
#germany #eu #ireland
in reply to Aral Balkan

Which EU institution is in charge of supervising policing in EU members states?
in reply to Veza85UE

@Veza85UE What? Why would we have such a thing? It has no bearing on the Single Market™
in reply to Aral Balkan

I didn't ask whether we should have one or not, I asked if it exists. Because if it doesn't, I'm not sure what exactly you expect "the EU" to do about what appears to be a local matter? Sarcasm about the Single Market (which is amazing but incomplete and we should work harder at it) is puerile.

btw, I have no theoretical objections to obliterating national states, a 19th century invention no longer fit for purpose on our continent. But in practical terms, they have to agree to it first.

in reply to Aral Balkan

Irish is an official language of the EU, and as an Irish person I find this very insulting, racist even we have a history of not being allowed to use our language.
in reply to Fiona Byrne 🍉

@fi In your own country, yes. There are several languages in which you cannot sing a particular kind of song in Germany, German first among them. According to the article, their rules are: you can sing in ANY language as long as there's an interpreter present. First I've heard of it, but hey, it's Germany, they have their own hate speech laws. You can agree or disagree with them, but they're not about you or your language.
in reply to Aral Balkan

Come on! That's disingenuous.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Aral Balkan

germany is going to host #euro2024. Are they gonna arrest every foreign #football fan for singing their songs?
in reply to Aral Balkan

Breaking: German police decree protests only to be allowed if you use small words and speak really slowly.
in reply to Aral Balkan

Are you sure you've got no Polish ancestors? The humour style sounds familiar. :-)
in reply to 8Petros [Atlas Unshrugged]_

@8petros Who knows… the Ottomans were all over the place, I’m probably a little bit of a lot of things :)
in reply to Aral Balkan

https://youtu.be/tJgKcCU2cLU?si=l79eEviNdKaM6Q1V

Aral Balkan reshared this.

in reply to Aral Balkan

Somehow I doubt that's legal. Another untested legal theory by our glorious police gets tested now. Probability is high it will be swatted down in court in around ... some years. Then they'll have a new theory.
in reply to Binary Large Octopus

@bloc Sadly it’s always the wrong people who feel shame and the ones who should that never do. And thankfully we’re not defined by our governments or the arbitrarily drawn borders we happened to be born within :)
in reply to Aral Balkan

Thats why I seldom identify with neither the area within the geographical border nor the random assembly of people happening to be stored within it.
#nobordersnonations
in reply to Aral Balkan

https://hachyderm.io/@glitzersachen/112319921219794215