#Rust for #Linux #maintainer steps down in #frustration with 'nontechnical #nonsense'
source: https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/02/rust_for_linux_maintainer_steps_down/
The video depicts resistance to #Filho's request to get information to statically encode file system interface semantics in Rust bindings, as a way to reduce errors. Ts'o's objection is that C code will continue to evolve, and those changes may break the Rust bindings – and he doesn't want the responsibility of fixing them if that happens.
#C #Programming #nerd #kernel #problem #support #future #news #code
Rust for Linux maintainer steps down in frustration with 'nontechnical nonsense'
Community seems to C Rust more as a burden than a benefitThomas Claburn (The Register)
like this
Richard
in reply to anonymiss • • •Adam Hunt
in reply to anonymiss • • •6ix likes this.
Richard
in reply to anonymiss • • •Adam Hunt
in reply to anonymiss • • •Richard
in reply to anonymiss • • •Greg A. Woods
in reply to anonymiss • • •While systemd might aspire to being a kernel, it isn't a kernel, so I'm not surprised it wasn't mentioned.
But rewriting systemd in Rust would be a great idea! Convolution upon Convolution!
Stuffing Rust code into the monster of ever churning C code that is the Linux kernel is insanity defined, but as a firm proponent of BSD I can only say "push on!".
DeVault has already written (in just 27 days) a wee new demo kernel in his new Hare language and it is at least a million times more readable and elegant than even one small module of Rust code.
Richard
in reply to anonymiss • • •