Search
Items tagged with: wfh
The future of work looks hybrid: 43% of professional workplaces now offer hybrid arrangements, up from 20% in 2023. And those arrangements are popular with workers. .Management professors explore the trends: buff.ly/V5ID5Jy #WFH
US workers with remote-friendly jobs are still working from home nearly half the time, 5 years after the pandemic began
Thatβs a huge change from 2019, when remote work accounted for only 7% of the nationβs paid workdays, even if itβs a big decline from 2020.The Conversation
Americans are spending nearly 1.5 hours less outside their homes in 2023 than in 2003. New research shows the pandemic accelerated a long-term trend of staying in. Does this sound familiar? buff.ly/zzztMZJ
#wfh #sociallife #COVID19 #CovidIsNotOver
(Edit: Now with the right graph)
America is becoming a nation of homebodies
Even after the pandemic lockdowns were lifted, out-of-home activities and travel remained substantially depressed, far below 2019 levels.The Conversation
#WFH with #privacy? 85% of Brit #bosses snoop on staff
#Employers remain blissfully unaware/wilfully ignorant of the impact of #surveillance on staff
More than 3/4 of #UK employers admit to using some form of surveillance tech to spy on their #remoteworkers.
Most popular form of surveillance was monitoring active work hours, with 54% saying this was going on, and employees' emails and chat logs were also examined, while 15% said they went as far as tracking keystrokes.
theregister.com/2025/01/30/forβ¦
#Employers remain blissfully unaware/wilfully ignorant of the impact of #surveillance on staff
More than 3/4 of #UK employers admit to using some form of surveillance tech to spy on their #remoteworkers.
Most popular form of surveillance was monitoring active work hours, with 54% saying this was going on, and employees' emails and chat logs were also examined, while 15% said they went as far as tracking keystrokes.
theregister.com/2025/01/30/forβ¦
WFH with privacy? 85% of Brit bosses snoop on staff
Employers remain blissfully unaware/wilfully ignorant of the impact of surveillance on staffConnor Jones (The Register)