Ok, so the #Maven team states that they deleted the posts they INGESTED WITHOUT CONSENT after the huge negative response from the #fediverse #community.
But yet, the question remains, don't 'The Rules' of each server include the fact that #UserContent is not to be stolen (taken without consent) ?
I mean one of the #MainReason to switch from #bigTech, is the idea that my #content is #notForSale, especially without my explicit say so.
https://wedistribute.org/2024/06/maven-mastodon-posts/
Maven Imported 1.12 Million Fediverse Posts (Updated)
💡 This article has been updated. A recent investigation by Liaizon Wakest revealed that Maven, a new social network founded by former OpenAI Team Lead Ken Stanley, has been importing a vast amount ofSean Tilley (We Distribute)
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
BeAware :veriweed:
in reply to The Noob • • •The Noob
in reply to BeAware :veriweed: • • •BeAware :veriweed:
in reply to The Noob • • •not sure exactly what you mean. But social media has never been private. Every social media that's got user profiles and posts like this are completely public with the option for some privacy through "followers only posts". This isn't signal.
Where does canonical fit into this?🤨
The Noob
in reply to BeAware :veriweed: • • •