Skip to main content


#ChatControl 1.0 HAS PASSED - despite a majority voting against it (314:276) 🚨

After the EU parliament has rejected it TWICE in the past, it has been pushed as an urgent procedure for a new plenary vote. The EU has simply continued to put the vote on the agenda to get the outcome they've wanted since the start.

This is not democratic‼️

📸 Roberta Metsola (EPP) who revived Chat Control 1.0 shaking hands with Mark Zuckerberg. Taken from EP_President posted May 27, 2026 on X.

reshared this

in reply to Tuta

just show how of a Traitor and criminal she is.

Just hope the fact she bypassed rules can struck down this "law".

in reply to Elena Rossini 🌈

@_elena never undrestood women that vote against their own liberty 🤔

i mean as a man that is to expend woman liberty to the exact same level as men it's completely alien to me why they do this ...

in reply to Elena Rossini 🌈

@_elena @Bredroll @skyblitz Given the way things are going, I won’t be surprised if they start pumping out the imperial march during sessions.
in reply to Tuta

So the whole push to switch from US tech to EU tech was a lie to just allow the powers-that-be gain more info and data upon a global level.
#EU are traitors to the people. Not surprised. They don’t care about anyone same as US. They just kindness-wash the people to make you think they are different than the likes of the other horrible political folk.
#BigTech #DataPrivacy
in reply to Tuta

what does this mean? How can it pass with only a minority voting in favour???
in reply to Juan Nunez-Iglesias

this vote was pushed through as "urgent procedure" by the EU Council, the EPP and the Parliament president (which is part of EPP) on Tuesday, and since the request for this second reading passed an absolute majority was needed to stop it today

the last time we voted for chat control it was rejected 311:228 so it was almost the same this time (314:276), it only wasn't enough because it was framed as "urgent" to enable the second reading and require the absolute majority

democracy at its finest /s :neocat_shocked:

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

what on earth is she posting on X for? And why is she cosying up to Zuckerberg? Is she the president of the US parliament, not the European parliament?
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

314 for and 276 against is not a majority voting against it or did I understand it wrong ?
in reply to Sgt Pépère

@sgtpepere
It was 314 against, 276 in favour.

patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-parlia…

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

I suppose the table full of pervert glasses in the picture is just the cherry on top. :blobcatfacepalm:
in reply to Tuta

So now what? What to avoid? Will #ChatControl be in apps? Or in the OS?
in reply to Tuta

power is with the people. We just need to guts to exercise it; wherever it may lead.
Even if it means going of line completely
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Conny Nasch
@_elena @skyblitz I tend to smell money in the play.
in reply to Tuta

This authoritarian EU bears no resemblance to its founding vision. As an EU citizen, I can only view the perversity of these corrupt policies with alarm and draw my own conclusions. "Chat Control 2.0" will likely become reality sooner than we fear.

We must fight even harder and stand united against this corruption.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

Bitch shakes hands with a cunt. I'll let you decide which is which.
in reply to Tuta

a party/MEP list sorted by country would be nice
in reply to Tuta

who would ever tought giving the control of SW and HW to a small group of companies would finish this way?
in reply to Tuta

What a joke. European “democracy” at its finest: just push your agenda until they eventually accept it (and not even that, since a relative majority voted against, just not an absolute one).

And yet they’ll pull a shocked Pikachu face when they see Euroscepticism is on the rise. Because that’s what will happen if you push away your remaining supporters with these anti-democratic measures.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

so am i getting this 2 points right?

- Chatcontrol 1.0 never had a vote in parliement where a majority of MEP (the democratically elected representants of the EU population) voted in favor
- It was then pushed in a way that unless an ABSOLUTE majority of MEP voted against it would become law

because if that's right that shows a structural problem in the EU even bigger than Chatcontrol itself: the idea that laws can be made by bypassing the democratic process

@Tutanota

@Tuta
in reply to Tuta

Is this why I got email from Reddit a few weeks ago that they were "complying with "EU law" by demanding age verification from certain accounts, when no EU law like that existed? Or was Reddit just up to their bullshit?
in reply to Tuta

Real sorry to see the fascist infection is apparently fully west European in derivation; but have to admit, it is unsurprising. May the head of the snake be fully severed this time around this mess. It will clearly be the long-way around and may that serve a memorable lesson as well.

/US-ian unhappily witnessing all now wonders just who gets that $1.4T, eh?

🪔🖖💎🩵📣

in reply to Tuta

them shaking hands over the Pervert Glasses... Lol!
in reply to Tuta

Under the pretext of protecting children online (which should be solely the responsibility of their parents), they finally have a tool for spying on citizens who are a thorn in the government's side.
in reply to Tuta

i hate roberta masturbatola for touching atoms with mark zuckerberg

a match made in hell

in reply to Tuta

It sounds like the European Union has invented a new system which is called "Reverse Democracy". That is where the government does the exact opposite of the will of the people.
in reply to Tuta

#metaepstein2

socialmediatoday.com/news/meta…

They are on in the same club.

in reply to Tuta

#RobertaMetsola, a conservative catholic, loaded, with a lobbyist husband, sucking up to weird billionaire tech bros who've been financing the white supremacist regime in the WH, is just another asshole to be boycotted!

All ultra-conservative religious fools have the same rapist vibe, forcing their will on others—whom they deem inferior—who clearly and repeatedly have said NO.

in reply to Tuta

The #Cyberfascists need to be jailed!

I'll never forgive nor forget this betrayal to you, @europarl_en !

- And I will actively sabotage this #cyberfascist shitshow by any means necessary!

How people interpret this ain't my problem...

- I merely exercise my inalienable #HumanRights to #privacy!!!

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

Seems like there is a history between Metsola and Zuckerberg.

lovinmalta.com/news/news-inter…

in reply to Tuta

von @marcuwekling denken…

"Oder wir machen es wie die #EU und stimmen so lange ab, bis uns das Ergebnis passt."

Irgendwie ist dieses Zitat wohl zeitlos… 🤮

in reply to Tuta

This is the greatest mistake ever. This is creating a permanent security hole in all devices. It will be hacked in weeks, and it won’t catch the paedophiles. 😰😰
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Jens Finkhäuser

@MPaola @skyblitz @connynasch @_elena If you score agreement that someone else is the worst, you're not the target. Until you run out of targets. Fortunately, targets grow up.

Sadly, I don't think it's much more than that.

in reply to SkyBlitz

@skyblitz @connynasch @_elena Most Italian women are as much if not more mysoginist than men, something to do with Madonna and child
in reply to Tuta

The problem with Democracy is that it doesn't pay politicians as well as the Oligarchs do.

The Oligarchs need to dial in just enough monitary "free speech" to get their social control bills passed. Sometimes that takes a few payment rounds.

After all, Capitalism is not democratic in any way. And extreme wealth inequality will only guarantee an end to democracy.

Winner takes all.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

shaking hands with a man whose algorithms have been deliberately tuned to ensnare children, and reviving chat control which isn't about protecting children, it's about giving a company like say 'Meta' the keys to age verification and mass surveillance of every single person in the EU, except those in positions of power who get to maintain their anonymity... because 'they're unlikely to be predators, or are likely'???. Smells of corruption, the EU is starting to stink of hypocrisy
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

true colors. Ok then, reason to go for technoanarchy even harder.
in reply to Tuta

The problem is when both the money and the government want something -- it will happen.
in reply to Tuta

Es wird solange gewählt, bis das Ergebnis passt. Alter deutscher Politikstil...🤷
in reply to Tuta

aha the good old EU vote until you get it right tactic. Haven’t seen that for a little while now.
in reply to Tuta

Can't there just be another vote again to repeal it? I mean, if the same subject can be brought to the table many times....
in reply to Tuta

let us remember this when we try to point to anti democratic behavior as an American problem. It is not. All over Europe we've been seeing serious fracturing of democracy in the past years, and this is a particularly brazen example. Pointing to US authoritarian behavior is just a way for European politicians to distract from their own. They just come in different flavors.
in reply to Tuta

Just like everything in IT you have a choice:

"Not now / maybe later" or "YES for ever"

My chat is now not safe for communication,
with the government, switch back to letter's.

in reply to Tuta

I had preferred groundhog day - they bring it in for vote and reject!
in reply to Tuta

the commission should be disbanded, there's no place for such an organism in a supposed democracy.
in reply to Tuta

How far will it be decided Palantir gets the contract for the ID checking, storage and tracking?
in reply to Tuta

Is there an EU court that this could be brought to? The fact that this legislation was literally rejected twice and bypassed a majority opposed vote to pass sounds like something that should be a flagrant violation of basically any democratic process.
in reply to Tuta

1. How can it pass with a majority voting against? Like how, technically is it possible? 2. What exactly was passed, what does it entail?
in reply to Tuta

for those that don't know what this means: it's exact the same thing when Trump called Infantino about that red card.
in reply to Tuta

fucking EU. not gonna get my messages scanned never, ever. Just going to vote for anti-EU radicals, no problem EU. You chose it for yourself
in reply to Tuta

Right, that's it.

I will order a couple of PinePhones for our junior family members.

I am not quite sure how chat control and client side scanning could be implemented on these devices.

A PinePhone works with just a local account so all images can be stored locally on the device.

qTox runs on a PinePhone, Wire in a web browser. Not sure if the developers of those programs will implement client side scanning of chats.

I assume that the mobian developers would not bend the knee.

in reply to Tuta

The European Union has been disgraced by Chat Control and how they've been corrupted for big US tech.
This was never about Child Protection, as demonstrated clearly by the Lawsuit against Grok AI and whatever Musk has handed to him by the courts.
in reply to Tuta

I sincerely hope she washed that hand with industrial grade bleach afterwards…
Unknown parent

in reply to Tuta

"Majority voting against it" is not true. There are 720 MEPs, so majority is 360.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Tuta

but this can be easily overturned. #chatControl has been rejected on two previous occasions and MEPs have received death threats to accept it on the third vote. The pathetic #farLeft #feminist Roberta #Metsola will face prosecution.

#EUcorruption #surveillance #privacy #spyware #encryption #brexit #frexit #gexit #itexit

in reply to Tuta

fightchatcontrol.eu/ contact your MEP here - to protest this ridiculous vote, but also to ask them to oppose Chat Control 2.0 which begins debate in September and would make this permanent (vsn 1.0 runs to 2028).
in reply to Tuta

& democracy's death toll rises.
Fucking imperials.
in reply to Tuta

this might be the biggest disappointment i’ve ever felt. First fighting for digital sovereignty and now approving this, this all feels like a big joke
in reply to Tuta

This is only the first step #Europe needs to stifle its own citizens!

After losing your right of free speech by basically implementing #chatcontrol people will not feel open to speak freely online #observereffect

Then they will implement a thing called #prebunking and actively start #censorship your chats, or #shadowban your conversation without you knowing.

They will implemend a #cbdc #euro and follow every monetary transaction, they will map your entire life!

When you become a problem to #Europe #dictatorship they can freeze all your assets *without* a legal court order, under the council regulation (EU) 2024/2642 ( October 8 2024) ask former retired Swiss colonel #JacquesBaud

You're unable to chat, unable to travel, unable to afford housing, unable to buy food.

They can basically erase your excistence from society with a click of a button!

You will own nothing and be happy!
#KlausSchwab #wef

in reply to Tuta

Imagine wasting an opportunity like this to punch Suckerberg in the face...
This entry was edited (1 week ago)