Skip to main content


So far nothing is being done to manage the flood of #AISlop on the #Internet.

The single way to "kind of" reduce it is by looking at the source (long established / people you know or that have a large following / are trusted)

Of course there is always change and that's a good thing, but this fundamentally changes things.

Will the internet as we know it, die because of #AI slop?

#LLM #artificialintelligence #artificial #digital #online #content #tech #technology #web #it #socialmedia #problem

  • Yes it will die (54%, 34 votes)
  • No it won't (37%, 23 votes)
  • Things will stay as they are (8%, 5 votes)
62 voters. Poll end: in 1 day

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

The useful internet died with enshittification - but yes, the zombie of it currently representing most people's experience of The Internetℒ️ is dying even more due to AI slop.
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

Some innovation will be needed to distinguish slop from genuine info. This will be driven by a forthcoming crisis of the LLMs. May the bubble burst!
in reply to step

@stephan324ppm

I think Google's algorithm is the only one that might still be able to distinguish artificial and "real" content, however #Google fully embraces #AI, so they will probably never share it.

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

The Internet as we knew it already died when adservers came up. It just becomes a bit deader now.
in reply to Martin Vogel

RE: helvede.net/@jwcph/11620407934…

@mardor haha
@jwcph and you should probably become friends ;)


The useful internet died with enshittification - but yes, the zombie of it currently representing most people's experience of The Internetℒ️ is dying even more due to AI slop.

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

Yes. Any changes wipe out the vote as you could have changed questions and so on.
in reply to Urban Camera

@uc makes sense, thank you for explaining :)

Just weird that it's only poll votes not shares/likes you know?

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

But everyone who shared receives a notification that you have edited the original post.
in reply to Urban Camera

@uc While that is true, all the votes did not come back, only a smaller part, as far as I could tell (obviously not representative, but still).
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

I don't think they're allowed a second vote, even if the votes are reset to zero. Not sure, but this is in the back of my mind.
in reply to Urban Camera

oh so you were not able to press vote again? interesting, thanks for telling me, maybe it's worth opening a Masto GitHub ticket for this?
This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Urban Camera

@uc can you please confirm as a reply that you were unable to vote again, so I can open a ticket on the Masto GitHub? :)
in reply to Urban Camera

@uc ok, then I won't open one, might have just been an issue with your browser or something eh :)
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

I think in many ways it has died in the sense of no longer the pages we used to visit are useful.

The good news is that the new generation of web has already started. Right now there is almost an alternative to every mainstream platform.

I believe that due to these new platforms not announced on main platforms (remember when people announced that they were leaving for Mastodon and they tried to prevent other users from seeing it?) Its hard to reach all of the new target audience

in reply to squareScarletCougar 🐱

we might need to build our own web search engine. I was reading about the indie web but facing the issue of "but how do I find these websites" situation
in reply to squareScarletCougar 🐱

@squareScarletCougar But once everyone moves here, won't the massive amount of #AISlop move with them?

Right now this is an uninteresting target, as it's relatively small.

Yeah we need to promote it way more, today I actually began work on a subreddit called /r/fedipropaganda ;)

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

maybe but I feel the main difference is the platform and the users. There is no algorithm or agenda pushing AI slop to our faces, people usually out it quickly.

Will it ever go away? I don't think so. Since years ago before GPT there was already slop being pushed now we are facing the wave of tossing everything to the wall and see what it sticks.

in reply to squareScarletCougar 🐱

@squareScarletCougar yeah, I remember article spinning and the likes, it just became much better.

#Google / #Bing are big time pushing #AISlop for sure. So many top results are obviously completely #Ai generated and maintained ;)

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

Pinterest is a great example. No one likes it now, its completely flooded with slop. The platform will either double down AND die or it will ban AI. Meanwhile users will migrate to different platforms scattered to whatever they will find. Just like the web back in the day where you find a website and stay on it
in reply to squareScarletCougar 🐱

🀝
The bane of my existence is that to promote the Fedi and other causes, I have to maintain accounts for this project on the dark side - as it's the best place to reach people who are not already agreeing hehe ;)
This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

its no different from when we did propaganda against the Nazis youtu.be/nk1eWaic2-M?si=VdxUHR…
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

Most of the slop is motivated by money. Once you are not being paid by the click the motivation for the slop goes way down.
in reply to gam3

Yeah that is true. The political etc. content seems to be a much smaller portion. So you are suggesting the ban of all ads on the web? Probably also unrealistic as it also finances a large portion of it, right?
This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

YouTube is very expensive and runs on ad revenue, so I think it is the test case. The shorts, which are more click driven that time driven seem to be much worse than the long format videos.
Competition is likely the answer though. If YouTube gets to bad people will start paying for Nebula or figure out a way to pay for a PeerTube server or somesuch.
But it't the pay per click that is the problem, not the ad IMHO.
in reply to gam3

but But why is AI PPC driven? Somehow seems to me like there are many other things it's used for, such a AD revenue, Affiliate Marketing, Promo, Propaganda and such?
This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

@MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ if ai slop is taking over the internet then ai will choke on itsself. because ai feeding on the content of the internet and ruminating already processed ai slop will lead to a model collapse. so ai will either be totally easy to spot after this collapse, or the ai companies will have to develop a way to identify ai slop and avoid it. this ability will then become common knowledge and a kind of equilibrium will develop ...

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Alexander Goeres π’€―

@jabgoe2089 Very interesting point, never even heard of this before, thanks for sharing! That would be extremely funny to watch ;)

However they can always opt to exclusively train on old content up to like 2020 or something right?

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

"AI" already damaged the open internet because to produce slop you first need to pilfer every accessible pool of information, and that brings down serversπŸ˜₯

But there is no point crying, in a sense some of this disruption was inevitable, it's a tipping point created by all of us making a lot of good digital information, code, art etc. available.

It's been exploited by bad actors but we need to really think what good actors would do. Screaming "fire" is at best the first step.

in reply to Open Risk

Wow never even heard of that issue before, learning so many new things today, thank you very much for sharing that with me ❀

My solution would be to ask or pay #Google to share their "data analyzation" algorithm:
mastodon.social/@madeindex/116…

If anyone can still distinguish #AI content from "real" content, it's very likely Google, as that has been at the core of their business model for so long.


@stephan324ppm

I think Google's algorithm is the only one that might still be able to distinguish artificial and "real" content, however #Google fully embraces #AI, so they will probably never share it.


This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

I have been running a wiki for more than a decade for people to use as they see fit. Its no longer possible because for each person visiting you have ten thousand bots scrapping indiscriminately. Effectively I must pay for a server for the "AI" bros to build LLMs to serve the same information in chatbot format (and collect payment 😑 )

The wiki is now behind a login. But even that will not survive. LLM's impersonating real people (e.g by filling forms) is getting easier by the day.

in reply to Open Risk

@openrisk sorry to hear that, how much has the traffic load reduced ever since you implemented that feature?
in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

oh, the bot traffic is substantially gone.

But once behind a login, old style search engines (google, bing etc.) don't index you either, so you effectively vanish.

Now the users are only people who already had bookmarked the wiki (and bother to request an account).

And since 95% have an gmail accounts, its again down to mama Google 🀦

You couldn't design a worse internet if you tried really hard.

in reply to MadeInDex πŸ“°πŸŒŽ

yep, the landing page is like that already (and maybe there is more to think along this direction, like have some dedicated namespace that is public etc.)

But wikis (like wikipedia itself) were designed to be open. For a friendly collaborating internet, not a hostile one...

Not clear to me how we could ever restore that environment. People have not realized that it was not a given and if you don't nurture your nice things they die.

⇧