So far nothing is being done to manage the flood of #AISlop on the #Internet.
The single way to "kind of" reduce it is by looking at the source (long established / people you know or that have a large following / are trusted)
Of course there is always change and that's a good thing, but this fundamentally changes things.
Will the internet as we know it, die because of #AI slop?
#LLM #artificialintelligence #artificial #digital #online #content #tech #technology #web #it #socialmedia #problem
- Yes it will die (54%, 34 votes)
- No it won't (37%, 23 votes)
- Things will stay as they are (8%, 5 votes)
This entry was edited (5 days ago)

JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •step
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to step • • •@stephan324ppm
I think Google's algorithm is the only one that might still be able to distinguish artificial and "real" content, however #Google fully embraces #AI, so they will probably never share it.
Martin Vogel
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Martin Vogel • • •RE: helvede.net/@jwcph/11620407934β¦
@mardor haha
@jwcph and you should probably become friends ;)
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
2026-03-10 09:05:34
MadeInDex π°π
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •Urban Camera
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Urban Camera • • •@uc makes sense, thank you for explaining :)
Just weird that it's only poll votes not shares/likes you know?
Urban Camera
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Urban Camera • • •Urban Camera
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Urban Camera • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Urban Camera • • •Urban Camera
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Urban Camera • • •JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •You always learn something new here! Seems good, however you can still kind of manipulate it by resetting it, if it doesn't go in the direction you might want π€·
@uc
MadeInDex π°π
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •squareScarletCougar π±
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •I think in many ways it has died in the sense of no longer the pages we used to visit are useful.
The good news is that the new generation of web has already started. Right now there is almost an alternative to every mainstream platform.
I believe that due to these new platforms not announced on main platforms (remember when people announced that they were leaving for Mastodon and they tried to prevent other users from seeing it?) Its hard to reach all of the new target audience
squareScarletCougar π±
in reply to squareScarletCougar π± • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to squareScarletCougar π± • • •@squareScarletCougar But once everyone moves here, won't the massive amount of #AISlop move with them?
Right now this is an uninteresting target, as it's relatively small.
Yeah we need to promote it way more, today I actually began work on a subreddit called /r/fedipropaganda ;)
squareScarletCougar π±
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •maybe but I feel the main difference is the platform and the users. There is no algorithm or agenda pushing AI slop to our faces, people usually out it quickly.
Will it ever go away? I don't think so. Since years ago before GPT there was already slop being pushed now we are facing the wave of tossing everything to the wall and see what it sticks.
MadeInDex π°π
in reply to squareScarletCougar π± • • •@squareScarletCougar yeah, I remember article spinning and the likes, it just became much better.
#Google / #Bing are big time pushing #AISlop for sure. So many top results are obviously completely #Ai generated and maintained ;)
squareScarletCougar π±
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to squareScarletCougar π± • • •squareScarletCougar π±
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to squareScarletCougar π± • • •The bane of my existence is that to promote the Fedi and other causes, I have to maintain accounts for this project on the dark side - as it's the best place to reach people who are not already agreeing hehe ;)
squareScarletCougar π±
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •- YouTube
youtu.begam3
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •MadeInDex π°π
in reply to gam3 • • •gam3
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •Competition is likely the answer though. If YouTube gets to bad people will start paying for Nebula or figure out a way to pay for a PeerTube server or somesuch.
But it't the pay per click that is the problem, not the ad IMHO.
MadeInDex π°π
in reply to gam3 • • •Alexander Goeres π―
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •@MadeInDex π°π if ai slop is taking over the internet then ai will choke on itsself. because ai feeding on the content of the internet and ruminating already processed ai slop will lead to a model collapse. so ai will either be totally easy to spot after this collapse, or the ai companies will have to develop a way to identify ai slop and avoid it. this ability will then become common knowledge and a kind of equilibrium will develop ...
Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y
Β Analysis shows that indiscriminately training generative artificial intelligence on real and generated content, usually done by scraping data fromΒ the Internet, can lead to a collapse in the ability of the models to generate diverse high-quality outβ¦
AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data - Nature
NatureMadeInDex π°π
in reply to Alexander Goeres π― • • •@jabgoe2089 Very interesting point, never even heard of this before, thanks for sharing! That would be extremely funny to watch ;)
However they can always opt to exclusively train on old content up to like 2020 or something right?
Open Risk
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •"AI" already damaged the open internet because to produce slop you first need to pilfer every accessible pool of information, and that brings down serversπ₯
But there is no point crying, in a sense some of this disruption was inevitable, it's a tipping point created by all of us making a lot of good digital information, code, art etc. available.
It's been exploited by bad actors but we need to really think what good actors would do. Screaming "fire" is at best the first step.
MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Open Risk • • •Wow never even heard of that issue before, learning so many new things today, thank you very much for sharing that with me β€
My solution would be to ask or pay #Google to share their "data analyzation" algorithm:
mastodon.social/@madeindex/116β¦
If anyone can still distinguish #AI content from "real" content, it's very likely Google, as that has been at the core of their business model for so long.
MadeInDex π°π
2026-03-10 09:08:07
Open Risk
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •I have been running a wiki for more than a decade for people to use as they see fit. Its no longer possible because for each person visiting you have ten thousand bots scrapping indiscriminately. Effectively I must pay for a server for the "AI" bros to build LLMs to serve the same information in chatbot format (and collect payment π‘ )
The wiki is now behind a login. But even that will not survive. LLM's impersonating real people (e.g by filling forms) is getting easier by the day.
MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Open Risk • • •Open Risk
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •oh, the bot traffic is substantially gone.
But once behind a login, old style search engines (google, bing etc.) don't index you either, so you effectively vanish.
Now the users are only people who already had bookmarked the wiki (and bother to request an account).
And since 95% have an gmail accounts, its again down to mama Google π€¦
You couldn't design a worse internet if you tried really hard.
MadeInDex π°π
in reply to Open Risk • • •Open Risk
in reply to MadeInDex π°π • • •yep, the landing page is like that already (and maybe there is more to think along this direction, like have some dedicated namespace that is public etc.)
But wikis (like wikipedia itself) were designed to be open. For a friendly collaborating internet, not a hostile one...
Not clear to me how we could ever restore that environment. People have not realized that it was not a given and if you don't nurture your nice things they die.