Skip to main content


Former CEO of Twitter wanted to build a social protocol no-one can control, like SMTP or HTTP for social media. Bluesky’s ATProto was supposed to be an open source protocol that Twitter could eventually utilize, but then Musk happened and Bluesky started taking it to the wrong direction and everything fell apart in Dorsey’s mind.

A very revealing interview. I now see even more future in W3C’s ActivityPub.

https://www.piratewires.com/p/interview-with-jack-dorsey-mike-solana

#ActivityPub #JackDorsey #Bluesky #Twitter #X #SocialWeb #SocialMedia

Roni Laukkarinen reshared this.

in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

I'm just a user and not a developer of the various protocols, but i wonder if it was more along the lines of NNTP?
in reply to john r red-horse

@jrredho I mentioned HTTP and SMTP because they are mentioned in the article. But yes, NNTP would be more fitting by category, although not in the sense of commonness or freshness.
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

I must wonder… if Dorsey truly wants to build something open, non-commercial and decentralized, why doesn’t he even look at the ActivityPub? Why not help it thrive? What’s all that fuss about Bluesky and Nostr?

#Fediverse #ActivityPub #JackDorsey

in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

Bluesky: because he wants to continue providing addicts their fix... And because he doesn't control ActivityPub, and can't re-form it in his image.

Nostr: because he is a Bitcoin-obsessed crypto bro

in reply to a goat‽

@nus Yeah. But now he only has Nostr. He completely ditched Bluesky.
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

don't expect rational reasoning from him. Dorsi to me is very similar to Balaji, too much wealth allowed them to surround themselves with a tight circle of "anti-state" morons and their thinking has been drifting to an irrational place that they can remain in for a long time because of the immense wealth they posses. They think they are all seeing all knowing prophets.

Things like activitypub is beneath Dorsi, not created by him or his crypto idealists.

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

I can't speak for JD, but I have talked to others who are either more into Farcaster or more into nostr (rather than the Fediverse), and I've talked to them about the Fediverse.

I have noticed some commonalities in what they said —

№1:

They believe that a significant part of the Fediverse is anti-commece.

They feel that commerce and payments are important.

№2:

They don't trust the servers controlling their identity and presence.

They feel it should be independent from any server.

in reply to @reiver ⊼ (Charles) :batman:

Thank-you I've just learnt of the existence of Farcaster! https://blog.thirdweb.com/what-is-farcaster/
@rolle
in reply to Gareth Kitchen

@gruff @reiver Wow, this is the first time I hear about Farcaster.

So… now we have 4 protocols which all try to achieve the ”truly decentralized social web”:

- ActivityPub
- ATProto
- Farcaster
- Nostr

What a mess :blob_smile_sweat:

#ActivityPub #Fediverse #ATProto #Nostr #Bluesky #Farcaster

Roni Laukkarinen reshared this.

in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

@gruff @reiver

Farcaster is definitely worth knowing about if youre interested in the current state of the SNS protocols; its got between 40k and 50k DAU, which is ~4 times as large as nostr (and somewhere between 5 times and 10 times smaller than fediverse)

It is very heavily the nft/web3 crowd. Obviously not my type of people, but I do think they're capable of getting the next style twitter migration, namely cryptotwitter

in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

ActivityPub is good enough - just adopt it. But no, everyone needs their own thing :blobcatboopadorable:
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

@gruff @reiver If we're being honest... I hardly even count Farcaster. It looks very centralized to me. It's just Twitter on a blockchain afaict
in reply to @reiver ⊼ (Charles) :batman:

@reiver I don't trust these billionaires. Like Musk and hyperloop. Just trying to tell that you need a new kind of train that will be here in 10 years, but while you wait, you can buy our products.
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

Because it is someone else's project, "not invented here", and he would not have a substantial role in developing it?
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

This was the exact question that came to my mind when I read the article.
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

Bluesky was always intended to be monetized. VC money isn't bequeathed for the betterment of users without some eye to profit. In order to achieve this they had to drive people to something cooler than what the other kids already had. Unique. Like the cybertruck.

Roni Laukkarinen reshared this.

in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

Oh, and no he doesn't. In the case of Bluesky, I believe he spent money in order to syphon off a left leaning corner from Twitter, doing this for Elon. You cannot ignore everything he has revealed himself to be in the last two years.
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

probably "not invented here" syndrome 🤷‍♂️. Or he wants to keep control over the protocol specification.
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

heavy emphasis on "Dorsey's mind", everything indicates he didn't even study Bluesky's protocol. The differences to Nostr he trumpets aren't significant.

I still prefer services where I know where my browser is connected, like Mastodon.

If you've tried Nostr, many of those web clients connect to tens of servers, some really dodgy sounding. You are basically spraying your IP everywhere, and your IP might be receiving highly unwanted content...

in reply to Jari Pennanen

@Ciantic Yeah, I find his affection to Nostr strange too. Why not even look the direction the ActivityPub is taking us, I wonder.
in reply to Roni Laukkarinen

That interview was bonkers but confirmed a whole lot of of things I speculated about.

Roni Laukkarinen reshared this.