In 1789, Americans elected a president.
Today that sentence sounds perfectly ordinary.
Modern Americans know exactly what a president is. The office sits at the center of government.

It commands armies, directs diplomacy, signs legislation, appoints officials, and oversees a vast federal bureaucracy.
But none of those assumptions existed in 1789.

The Constitution had created a presidency.
The problem was that nobody fully understood what a presidency was supposed to be.

In fact, many Americans were still trying to understand what the United States itself was supposed to be.

The republic was new.
The government was new.
The Constitution was new.

And the office of President was little more than a few paragraphs on a sheet of paper.
The United States was not choosing a familiar leader.
It was inventing one.

A Head of State Without a State
Most rulers in history inherited institutions.
Kings inherited kingdoms.
Emperors inherited empires.
Even successful revolutionaries usually inherited governments, bureaucracies, armies, tax systems, and courts.
George Washington inherited almost none of these things.

The United States possessed territory, population, and international recognition.
But many of the institutions that modern people associate with a functioning state barely existed.
There was no large federal bureaucracy.
There was no national police force.
There was no established administrative system stretching across the continent.

The federal government collected little revenue and employed remarkably few people.
Many Americans felt a stronger connection to their state than to the distant federal government.
In practical terms, the republic remained a work in progress.
Yet at the top of this unfinished structure stood a president.
The office existed.
The job did not.

Why Not a King?
The delegates who gathered in Philadelphia knew they needed an executive.
The experience of the Confederation years had demonstrated the weaknesses of government without one.
Laws needed to be enforced.
Foreign governments needed someone with whom they could negotiate.
The military required civilian leadership.
The nation needed a public face.
Yet Americans had just fought a war against a king.
The solution could not be another monarch.
This created a dilemma.

How could a republic create a powerful executive without recreating the very institution it had rejected?

The answer was the presidency.
Even the title reflected caution.
The word “President” already existed.
Universities had presidents.
Organizations had presidents.
Legislative bodies had presidents.
The title sounded administrative rather than royal.
It suggested a chairman rather than a sovereign.
No one could know that this modest title would eventually become one of the most powerful offices in the world.

The Man More Real Than the Institution
The presidency might not have survived its first years had anyone other than Washington occupied it.
The office itself possessed little prestige.
Washington possessed enormous prestige.
This distinction is crucial.

Today the office lends authority to the individual.
In 1789 the individual lent authority to the office.
Americans trusted Washington long before they trusted the federal government.
They knew him as commander of the Continental Army.
They knew him as the man who had led the Revolution.
Most importantly, they knew him as the man who had surrendered power.
In 1783, after victory over Britain, Washington resigned his military commission and returned to private life.
To modern readers this may seem unremarkable.
To eighteenth-century observers it seemed extraordinary.

History offered countless examples of victorious generals who transformed military success into personal rule.
Washington did the opposite.
He walked away.
This decision shaped everything that followed.
Americans who feared monarchy could believe that Washington would not become a king.
Without that trust, the presidency might have appeared far more dangerous.

A Government Without a Government
The modern presidency is surrounded by institutions.
The early presidency was surrounded by uncertainty.

Who would carry out presidential decisions?
Who would collect federal revenues?
Who would enforce federal laws?
Who would represent the nation abroad?

The answers were often unclear.
The government Washington inherited was astonishingly small.
The executive departments had to be organized.
The financial system had to be constructed.
The diplomatic service had to be expanded.
Even communication posed challenges.
A presidential message might require days or weeks to reach distant parts of the country.
Many functions that modern citizens assume are permanent features of government simply did not exist.
The federal government was less a machine than a blueprint.
Washington’s administration spent much of its time constructing institutions that later generations would take for granted.

Inventing the Presidency
The Constitution established powers.
It did not establish traditions.
No one knew how the office would operate in practice.

Would the President rely heavily on advisors?
Washington created a cabinet.
Would executive departments report directly to the President?
Washington established that pattern.
Would the President represent the nation as a whole rather than a particular state?
Washington set that precedent.
Would the office remain subordinate to constitutional limits?
Washington demonstrated that it would.
Many features of the presidency emerged not from the Constitution itself but from decisions made during the first administration.
The office evolved through practice.
The presidency was being invented in real time.

The Fear Behind the Experiment
For all their confidence in Washington, Americans remained cautious.
The Revolution had not eliminated fears of concentrated power.
It had intensified them.

Many citizens worried that any strong executive might gradually become a monarch under a different name.
These concerns shaped the constitutional system.
Congress controlled appropriations.
The courts remained independent.
The President served a limited term.
Impeachment existed as a safeguard.
Checks and balances were not signs of trust.
They were signs of caution.

The Founders believed government was necessary.
They also believed government could become dangerous.
The presidency reflected both beliefs simultaneously.

Conclusion
Modern Americans often view the presidency as a permanent and familiar institution.
In 1789 it was neither.
The office was new.
The government was new.
The republic itself was an experiment whose future remained uncertain.
Americans knew they needed an executive.
They did not know what kind of executive a republic could safely trust.
That question would shape the first years of the nation.

The Constitution created the office.
Washington created the presidency.

And in doing so, he helped transform a fragile political experiment into a functioning government.

Sources and Further Reading

• The Constitution of the United States
  (Article II — The Executive Branch)
• The Federalist Papers
  (especially Federalist No. 67, No. 69, No. 70, and No. 71)
• George Washington: Writings
• His Excellency: George Washington
• The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787
• The Age of Federalism

RE: mastodon.social/@_elena/116735…

A warning from Elena on W Social & @EUCommission.

Why would an institute like the European Commission ever want to 'rent' a social media account instead of owning their own server is beyond me.
If you're not the owner you do not control your messaging. We cannot verify the validity & authenticity of your message, which is quite important for political institutions I'd say. It can be done correctly, e.g. the Dutch government's social.overheid.nl server.

#Politics #EU #WSocial #SocialMedia

Elena Rossini 🌈

2026-06-12 07:26:38

Dear Fedi friends,

Apologies for another toot about #WSocial but I am genuinely shaking right now.

The @EUCommission and its president Ursula von der Leyen have recently migrated their ATproto (Bluesky) accounts to W Social.

I cannot fathom why they would pick a private enterprise whose leaders didn't even have ATproto accounts 3 months ago... and who are so open to having their users' data mined to train European AI models.

My articles on them:

🔗 : blog.elenarossini.com/tag/w-so…

Wow. Just wow.

W Social - Elena Rossini

Essays by Italian film director and photographer Elena Rossini - about creativity, digital literacy and harnessing the power of the internet for change

^{Elena Rossini}